Friday, November 01, 2019

Unmasked!

Blow the whistle.
Some far-white agitator may have outed the whistleblower.

The name of the whistleblower is allegedly a CIA analyst and former National Security Council staffer who served under Barack Obama and Donald J. Trump. He is a career intelligence officer.

The whistleblower's attorneys and Democrats have fought to keep his identity concealed, while Trump and his Republican allies have called for him to be identified publicly, saying he should be questioned about why he came forward and possible political bias because of his background. The existence of whistleblower complaint regarding Trump's conduct with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was first revealed in September.

Do nothing lawmakers like Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) have already went to town over an article being published by Paul Sperry, a far-white kookspiracy nut who wrote for Real Clear Investigations. The article named Eric Ciaramella as possibly being the whistleblower who came forward with the allegations of Trump trying to pressure Ukraine to get dirt on Joe Biden.

This lead to an impeachment inquiry and also sparked ire among Democratic lawmakers who believe the attempts to undermine investigations.
Far-white agitator Paul Sperry is trying to expose the whistleblower. 
Ciaramella could not be reached for comment. The attorneys for the whistleblower said they can't confirm or deny acknowledgement of the identity.

"Our client is legally entitled to anonymity. Disclosure of the name of any person who may be suspected to be the whistleblower places that individual and their family in great danger. Any physical harm the individual and/or their family suffers as a result of disclosure means that the individuals and publications reporting such names will be personally liable for that harm. Such behavior is at the pinnacle of irresponsibility and is intentionally reckless."

Again, Trump back in July was on a phone call with Zelensky. He was asking for a "favor." He was urging the Ukrainian government to open up an investigation into Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden. He was urging Ukraine to announce they played a role in the hacking of the Democratic National Committee's server. The U.S. intelligence agencies have determined that the Russian government had been influential in the 2016 election. The Russian government is still interfering in the 2020 election. 
Trump is accused of forcing a quid pro quo in which aid to Ukraine would only be released if an investigation was launched.

Old fart Rush Limbaugh decides to attack the whistleblower. He calls the guy a "pajama wearing Obama boy."



Yesterday, the Democrats voted on an open session of the impeachment inquiry. The Republicans voted against it and called it a "witch hunt."

Republicans have been demanding that the proceedings were held in public. The Democrats gave them what they wanted and yet they're not happy about it.

The Republicans and conservative allies struggled with a message. So far they're riding on claims that the whistleblower is a partisan. They are insulting the lawmakers. They are calling witnesses a bunch of "deep state" actors, etc.
The Do-Nothing "Freedom Caucus." A bunch of grumpy old white men who are dedicated to keeping Trump's lawlessness in tact. They are the status quo of Washington. White privilege politics keeps these assholes in Washington, DC.
They claim that Rep. Al Green (D-TX), Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) were plotting for impeachment since Trump came to office. They are claiming that the testimonies are "closed door" and "Soviet-style."

They are calling the witnesses are bunch of traitors and part of the "deep state."

The beginning of opening inquiry will begin in November. We're going to see how Trump and Republicans handle this. We will see Democrats demand Trump to turn over documents and witnesses. If Trump fails at doing so, it's likely he will be impeached. He will be the third sitting president to be impeached.

The name of the whistleblower is speculation. We don't have confirmation nor we have an official release from reputable news outlets.

So I don't want to believe the hype. Cause these are the same folks who believed that Seth Rich was the guy who gave Wikileaks the DNC emails.



No comments:

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails