Friday, September 11, 2026

Allegedly A Black Juror Said Lindsay Clancy Was Not Crazy When She Killed Her Kids!

White women backed Lindsay Clancy, a woman who killed her children because she claimed demons made her do it. A Black juror didn't buy this bullshit.

Apparently a Black juror in the controversial Lindsay Clancy trial stood on business.

It ended in a mistrial.

Clancy fatally strangled her three children—five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old Callan—at the family's home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, United States. She then attempted suicide by cutting her wrists and neck and jumping from a second-story window, sustaining injuries that left her paralyzed from the waist down. 

Lindsay later said she heard an auditory hallucination commanding her to commit the acts and felt unable to resist.

The juror wanted to find her guilty without cause while the rest wanted to find her guilty by reason of insanity. The juror basically stood on the principle stating, "there's no damn fucking reason to kill your own kids."

He wanted to convict her of first degree murder.

I never followed the trial of the Massachusetts woman who murdered her own children in 2023 and then tried to commit suicide by throwing herself out of high story building. She survived but was permanently paralyzed from it.

White women (who likely voted for President Donald J. Trump) were in favor of Clancy.

White women (who have biracial children who identify as Black), Black America and other people of color likely saw this as a show trial where if it was a Black woman, she would be found guilty and given a pass on mental health.

It's a white woman who grew up in privilege which generates automatic sympathy. 

Clancy earns support from the pink parade.

Lindsay was prosecuted for three counts of murder in a criminal trial that began on July 20, 2026. Although she did not dispute killing her children, her defense argued that she had been suffering from postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder and therefore lacked criminal responsibility. Much of the trial focused on her mental health in the months before the deaths, during which she sought treatment from multiple healthcare providers for symptoms including insomnia, intrusive thoughts, and suicidal ideation. Prosecutors alleged that Lindsay was mentally aware at the time of the killings and that her actions beforehand, including sending her husband out on an errand, demonstrated methodical planning. They emphasized that she reported hearing the commanding voice only on the day of the killings and that none of her clinicians had documented observing psychosis.

After nearly six weeks of trial proceedings and a week of jury deliberation, the jury reported that it was deadlocked. The jury foreperson informed judge William F. Sullivan that a single holdout juror might be disregarding his instructions on reasonable doubt. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington filed an emergency appeal with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court requesting that the juror be questioned or removed. After the motion was denied, Sullivan formally declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. The next hearing is slated for September 29, 2026.

The case became one of the most closely followed criminal trials in the US and prompted wide discussion of postpartum mental illness and criminal responsibility. Both Lindsay and her former husband, Patrick Clancy, filed civil lawsuits against her former healthcare providers, alleging that medical malpractice and negligence had contributed to the deaths of their children.

They are planning on retrying her in 2027.

Clancy's attorney is begging for Trump to federally pardon her. 

No comments:

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails