Conservative Outrage Over Gwen Ifill's Bibi Dig!

The right upset over Gwen Ifill's dig at foreign leader Benjamin Netanyahu. 

Conservative outrage once again. They're upset that a PBS news anchor took a dig at a foreign leader that the conservatives see as an honorary American leader.

Gwen Ifill went to the social media to dig at Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's failed attempts to derail the Iranian nuclear deal. He came to Washington in March to protest the deal.

The Democrats promise to block any Republican attempts to destroy the Iranian deal. The United Nations and power nations support the Iranian deal. The United States led the way for agreement.

The deal will require mandatory inspections, regulations on nuclear fuel and easing of sanctions.

The United Kingdom, Russia, China, France and Germany support the deal and have proceeded with implications to lift sanctions. The United States is stalled because of Republicans and Democrats squabbles.

Ifill went to social media to take a light jab by saying "Take That Bibi".

Take that, Bibi. https://t.co/V9Gn9vP6xN

— gwen ifill (@gwenifill) September 2, 2015

With the #IranDeal, Iran's program is significantly less dangerous. This is what that famous drawing looks like now: pic.twitter.com/ZsOy3Il4S7

— The Iran Deal (@TheIranDeal) September 2, 2015

PBS ombudsman Michael Getler responded back to the expected conservative outrage by giving a reprimand to Ifill for her social media responses.

Getler wrote in his column that Ifill’s tweet was a “self-inflicted wound” and unbecoming of a journalist. After her tweet “quickly produced a lot of angry emails in the ombudsman’s inbox,” he wrote Ifill asking for an explanation.

Netanyahu's infamous bomb cartoon at the United Nations.

Getler added that he wasn’t buying Ifill’s excuse that she was just summarizing Obama’s views. “One would have to lean way over backwards to give her the benefit of the doubt that she was simply shedding light on the administration’s view of portions of Netanyahu’s arguments.”

“But to personalize it by saying, ‘Take that, Bibi’ is, in my book, inexcusable for an experienced journalist who is the co-anchor of a nightly news program watched by millions of people over the course of any week,” he concluded.

Out the gate comes the first reaction from a conservative. Matter of fact, he managed to throw Black Lives Matter into the fray. Pathetic.

.@gwenifill @TheIranDeal did you say this in your calm NPR All Things Considered voice or your racist cop killing #BlackLivesMatter voice?

— Steven Shaw (@czechov) September 2, 2015

Gwen Landfill -- Gwen Eyeful of Butt Ugly @czechov @whiteshot @gwenifill @TheIranDeal

— Mimi Mayes (@mimimayesTN) September 4, 2015

.@gwenifill Take that Winston! pic.twitter.com/EvhDBrsOek

— Steven Shaw (@czechov) September 2, 2015

And that racial dig netted a response from a Black Lives Matter activist.

@czechov @gwenifill @TheIranDeal Perhaps her Eric Rudolph voice? pic.twitter.com/m8M0sW6jA8

— Richard Bottoms (@rbottoms) September 4, 2015

@czechov @gwenifill @TheIranDeal "We're calling this 'The Pattern'" ~ P. Broyles

— Richard Bottoms (@rbottoms) September 4, 2015

@czechov @gwenifill @TheIranDeal I don't know perhaps it was in her Tim McVeigh voice? pic.twitter.com/47swTTEf9Q

— Richard Bottoms (@rbottoms) September 4, 2015

@czechov @gwenifill @TheIranDeal Or maybe her David Sweat voice? pic.twitter.com/dAGqOhNIjx

— Richard Bottoms (@rbottoms) September 4, 2015

@czechov @gwenifill @TheIranDeal Maybe her James Holmes voice? pic.twitter.com/PxsF52AFNE

— Richard Bottoms (@rbottoms) September 4, 2015

@czechov @gwenifill @TheIranDeal Or her Jerad and Amanda Miller voice? pic.twitter.com/LMfTiMt5C9

— Richard Bottoms (@rbottoms) September 4, 2015

So now if someone in the junk food media criticizes a foreign leader, it's apparently Black Lives Matters fault. Anyway, this is how far we've gotten. You can't even criticize, praise or support something without getting an earful of criticism.

So if I dig at a foreign leader, I am expected to be hit with criticism.

So if Ifill criticizes Netanyahu, she's an anti-Semitic. Funny, since when does criticizing a foreign leader is anti-Jew?

So if I dig at a political group, I guess I'm expected to be hit with criticism.

So if I dig at a person based on political beliefs, I guess I'm expected to be hit with criticism.

Iran: Netanyahu And The Republicans Are __________ The Peace Deal!

Iranian president Hassan Rouhani.

God damn it. I am so tired of Republicans and their obstruction. Now they're playing this "who's got the bigger balls" debate. They undermine the president by kissing the ass of a foreign leader. Now they threaten to sabotage historical peace talks to disarming Iran.

The same assholes who bitched about President Barack Obama winning a Nobel Peace Prize are now bitching about this proposal. Even though it's time to move pass these silly feuds with Iran and Cuba, the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Republican majority continue to fuck up the world, because of their utter hatred of the leaders of these countries. The Republicans don't give two fucks about these peace talks.

Seem like the terms of endearment comes with a price. Some are claiming that the Senators who signed it may have violated the law.

Republican senators mail the letter to Tehran. They call for no negotiations. They call for more sanctions and possible action if Iran continues on. They tell Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Hassan Rouhan that any deal with the U.S. can be undone with the next president or Congress. They also claim that the missile will be heading their way if they try anything funny.

We finally introduce the controversial Arkansas Republican senator Tom Cotton to the fold.

He along with Majority Leader Mitch The Turtle (R-KY), fellow Stallmigos Ted Cruz (R-TX), Joni Ernst (R-IA) Mike Lee (R-UT), Rand Paul (R-KY), Tim Scott (R-SC), Marco Rubio (R-FL), David Purdue (R-GA), Thom Tillis (R-NC) and numerous others signed up to this bullshit.

These assholes are defying years of delicate talks. For what reason?

To undermine the president.

Forty-seven Republicans on Sunday wrote directly to Tehran to suggest that any nuclear deal with the Obama administration would not be constitutionally binding because a future president or Congress could take steps to revoke it.

The White House blasted the Republicans. Vice President Joe Biden called the move an unprecedented affront "designed to undercut a sitting president."

CNN reports that President Barack Obama slammed Republican senators who penned a letter attempting to warn Iran that any pending nuclear agreement will face their scrutiny, claiming they were aligning themselves with Iranian "hard-liners."

"I think it's somewhat ironic to see some members for Congress wanting to make common cause with the hard-liners in Iran. It's an unusual coalition," Obama said Monday ahead of a meeting with European Council President Donald Tusk.

"I think what we're going to focus on right now is actually seeing whether we're going to get a deal or not. Once we do, if we do, we'll be able to make the case to the American people, and I'm confident we'll be able to implement it," Obama said.

Stallmigo Tom Cotton's (R-AR) stunt may actually help move talks.

The Iranian foreign minister Dr. Javad Zarif dismissed their letter as "propaganda" and told the Republicans to actually read the U.S. Constitution before they make these irrational protocols.

The Iran Primer asked the foreign minister. Zarif expressed astonishment that some members of US Congress find it appropriate to write to leaders of another country against their own President and administration. He pointed out that from reading the open letter, it seems that the authors not only do not understand international law, but are not fully cognizant of the nuances of their own Constitution when it comes to presidential powers in the conduct of foreign policy.

Foreign Minister Zarif added that “I should bring one important point to the attention of the authors and that is, the world is not the United States, and the conduct of inter-state relations is governed by international law, and not by US domestic law. The authors may not fully understand that in international law, governments represent the entirety of their respective states, are responsible for the conduct of foreign affairs, are required to fulfil the obligations they undertake with other states and may not invoke their internal law as justification for failure to perform their international obligations.”

The Republicans are forever stuck on stupid. By electing these idiots to the Congress, we'll see President Barack Obama's final years marred by the utter stupidity of Republicans.

Bibi And Wings!

American lawmakers kiss this foreign leader's ass. 

The junk food media, the conservative agitators and Republicans have declared their allegiance to the Israeli government. They have made Israel the 51st state.

They pledge their loyalty to the State of Israel.

Instead of working on a peaceful end to the Iran's nuclear ambitions, the Republican Party, the junk food media, the conservative agitators and Benjamin Netanyahu will push for more sanctions that could derail international talks.

His anticipated speech has caused an uproar. The Weeper of the House John Boehner (R-OH) has invited Netanyahu to address a Joint Session of Congress without proper acknowledgment to the White House. The president was none to thrilled about this. Some say this is an attempt to scaremonger and help Netanyahu win his bid for reelection as Israeli prime minister. This breech of protocol has gotten to the point where now it's out in the open, President Barack Obama had enough of Netanyahu meddling in the affairs of America.

The president will not meet Netanyahu during his visit. Vice President Joe Biden will not attend the Joint Session. A handful of Democratic politicos are boycotting this.

American Israel Public Affairs Committee is cautiously supporting the decision to have him speak.

The controversial conservative leader has maintained that Iran is "close" to developing nuclear weapons, and he's vowed to attack the nation if the United States and its allies refuse to do so. He opposes the two-state solution for the Palestinian territories. Netanyahu continues to advocate building Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

No new friends.

Britain, France, Russia, China, Germany and the United States have worked hard to negotiate a deal to halt Iran from producing nuclear weapons.

President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry are working with the five leaders in Switzerland to accomplish this. The Six Party talks are extremely important. These talks will hopefully give the United Nations an opportunity to inspect the Iran's nuclear plants and defuse any reactors that could be used in producing a weapon.

Republicans made Israeli defense a top priority among their obsession to stop the Islamic State.

They gotten tired of claiming the president is hurting the economy with his policies. So now instead of playing to this"Obama's not working" narrative, they've figured now "Obama's is weak on terrorism and foreign policy".

For one thing, I do not support foreign leaders. I have unanimous support for the United States and the president. I don't care what party the president represent. As long as I declare my loyalty to the country of my birth, no other country matters.

Israel has nuclear weapons.

Israel has a espionage service called the Mossad. The agency has been notorious in killing people without due process. They are considered terrorists.

Israel's military has committed war crimes. In the 2014 conflict in the Gaza Strip, over 3,000 people (mostly innocent people) died and Netanyahu doesn't give a fuck about them.

I'm going to be upfront with you.

It's about time the United States start cutting ties with Israel. I mean this ongoing debate over a two party solution has been over 60 years of failed policies and a bunch of stubbornness.

We've put too much time and effort into a failure.

Netanyahu is not willing to work for peace. He benefits from war and his speech to the Congress is another attempt to drive the Western backed powers into an endless war.

Indianz.Com > News > Column: Nevada Natives oppose nuclear waste

Indianz.Com > News > Column: Nevada Natives oppose nuclear waste: "'A small group of Native Americans, professors and government officials met last week in Nevada to exchange information on nuclear waste issues as they relate to Native Americans.

The discussion was disturbing. Chicagoans and Native Americans alike should be alarmed. One of the big issues discussed week was the transportation of radioactive waste to Yucca Mountain, if the site receives the approval being sought by the DOE from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission."