Why Does He Have To Answer For Everything Someone Else Does?

Tell us why Americans are paying more for gas, groceries and insurance? Yeah, I know but the elite aren't listening to them.

The outrage over an online ad suggesting that Americans are frustrated with billions od our taxpayer money going to Israel has the junk food media angry. Now they call for Abdul El-Sayed to denounce the ad.

We're picking on the "Jewish" state says the junk food media agitators.

At this point, I am getting tired of hearing about the Jewish state. It is fucking Israel, a white Jewish supremacist, apartheid genocidial ethnostate.

A political campaign ad released by Cenk Uygur’s Rebellion PAC in support of Michigan El-Sayed has drawn widespread criticism. The ad criticizes U.S. foreign aid to Israel, tying billions of dollars in military spending to domestic economic struggles and rising living costs in the U.S.

Why is it controversial?

It is saying that if the United States stops giving billions to Israel, Americans could afford a basic living. It doesn't mention Jews or Muslims. It mentions a foreign country and the United States going to war with Iran.

New @RebellionPac ad dropping in Michigan. We have to suffer here at home, so Israel can get all its wars. That’s why they buy politicians like Mike Rogers. He promised to serve Israel “unconditionally,” but never made that promise to you. https://t.co/mtgVOyNczg

— Cenk Uygur (@cenkuygur) October 24, 2026

El-Sayed’s campaign issued a statement distancing itself from the ad, noting that Rebellion PAC does not speak for the candidate and that his campaign was not involved in producing or authorizing it. However, critics and political opponents noted that El-Sayed stopped short of explicitly calling the ad’s message antisemitic or formally condemning its contents.

The narrative tapped by Rebellion PAC—questioning foreign military expenditures while Americans face a high cost of living—resonates with a growing populist sentiment among both younger voters and progressives.

Why does he have to answer to an ad he has nothing to do with his campaign?

Why is the junk food media obsessed with tone policing?

Supporters of this view, including Cenk Uygur, argue that criticizing U.S. military aid to Israel is a legitimate economic and geopolitical position. From this perspective, focusing on how federal tax dollars are spent abroad versus domestically is a standard political argument, and labeling it as targeting Jewish people is a form of tone-policing meant to shut down valid policy debate.

Critics, including Jewish community leaders, a group of local rabbis, and federal lawmakers like Rep. Brad Schneider (D-IL) (co-chair of the Congressional Jewish Caucus), condemned the ad, arguing that it invokes classic antisemitic tropes by blaming the Jewish state for the economic hardships of American citizens.

Critics—including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), political figures like Rep. Haley Stevens (D-MI), and Van Jones—argue that accusing a Jewish state or Jewish people of causing the financial distress of everyday citizens mirrors centuries-old antisemitic conspiracy theories.

So why did President Donald J. Trump go to war with Iran?

A nuclear weapon and aligned with terrorism. Or perhaps, Iran threatened to kill him, Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio after they killed their leaders.

Or perhaps, we went to war because two men don't want to go to the iron college.

That little country that is causing chaos in West Asia. 

Driving us to World War III.