Friday, October 07, 2022

They Just Can't Leave Her Alone!

They won't stop until Meghan is dead.

You wonder why five Caribbean nations are seeking autonomy from the crown! 

British colonialism and the racist coverage of an African American woman who happens to married to a royal prince. She gave up her acting career because of love. 

The noise and the Royal Family are actively trying to break this up. 

Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan are preparing to hire attorneys to sue some of these British newspapers and tabloids. Cause the noise is driving them to a point where it could bring danger to the Sussex family.

Harry stated the media won't stop until she is dead. He said he is really protective of his wife. He saw what they done to his mother, Princess Diana and he sees history repeating itself.

In another edition of pointless anti-Meghan news, The Daily Mail claims that Spotify cancelled 11 podcasts to make room for Archetypes, the podcast hosted by Duchess Meghan. It is just trash.

Spotify has taken a nosedive because of Joe Rogan. The podcast is costly and his antics have driven revenue down. Many artists have pulled their catalogs from Spotify.

Meghan has nothing to do with the decisions of Spotify.

The Daily Mail gives the baseless impression that she magically told executives to cancel low rated podcasts to make her show the top feature. Just pathetic on Associated Newspapers Ltd.

She hosted Lisa Ling and Margaret Cho on the cultural appropriation and negative stereotypes of Asian Americans. The junk food media in Britian made it seem like Meghan was being an angry Black woman.

How long will this noise go?

I mean the Associated Newspapers, Ltd. got sued by the Duchess for leaking personal information without consent. What will it take for the far right tabloid to stop the noise?

Some of the racist headlines Markle was subjected to over the years included that she was "fueling human rights abuses, drought, and murder" for eating avocados and that her mother's hometown was "(almost) straight outta Compton" and "gang-scarred."

And it seems like The Daily Mail and its affiliate publications are going to be facing another round of lawsuits from Harry and Meghan. On top of that, Elizabeth Hurley, Sadie Frost, Baroness Doreen Lawrence, Elton John and his husband David Furnish are going to put that noise on the stand.

The group claim they have been “the victims of abhorrent criminal activity and gross breaches of privacy by Associated Newspapers,” according to a press release from law firm Hamlins, which is representing Prince Harry and Frost.

What is classified as the most disrespectful towards the Duchess of Sussex?
Comparing Duchess Meghan to Princess Catherine.
Calling her Meghan Markle instead of her formal title, Duchess of Sussex.
Reporting asinine stories alleging Duchess Meghan was mean or hateful.
Constant reminders of how Duchess Meghan failed royal protocols.
American and British agitators finding some stupid excuse to justify hate towards Duchess Meghan.
White British and American trolls online constantly replying about Duchess Meghan.
King Charles III not formally condemning the attacks on Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan.
All of these above.
Created with Supersurvey

John, Furnish, Hurley and Baroness Lawrence are repped by law firm Gunnercooke.

Court records show three separate lawsuits citing “misuse of private information” were filed against Associated in London’s High Court today (Oct. 6) by Gunnercooke on behalf of its clients. Prince Harry and Frost’s lawsuits have yet to appear in court records but Hamlins said that legal action has been launched.

Amongst the allegations, the group claim that Associated hired private investigators to bug their cars and homes, hired people to listen into their telephone conversations, paid police for inside information, impersonated staff at hospitals and clinics to obtain information and accessed bank accounts and financial transactions “through illicit means and manipulation.”

A spokesperson for Associated Newspapers told Variety: “We utterly and unambiguously refute these preposterous smears which appear to be nothing more than a pre-planned and orchestrated attempt to drag the Mail titles into the phone hacking scandal concerning articles up to 30 years old. These unsubstantiated and highly defamatory claims – based on no credible evidence – appear to be simply a fishing expedition by claimants and their lawyers, some of whom have already pursued cases elsewhere.”

The lawsuit will be the third Prince Harry has brought against Associated Newspapers in as many years. He has sued twice previously for libel and slander. At least one lawsuit is ongoing, regarding a story about Prince Harry’s bid for private security provided by the Metropolitan Police in the U.K. He won the first stage of the lawsuit in July.

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails