Did The NRA's "Freed Negro" Forget That King Was Killed By A Bullet?

"Freed" Negro tries to say that MLK would be happy that our country has the most relaxed gun laws!

The NRA is the oldest gun lobbyist group out there. They're trying to gin up dollars for the possibility of Republicans taking back the U.S. Senate. They recruit a Black conservative YouTube star to promote their message of more guns and less regulation.

I understand that everyone believes the civil rights leader fought for the rights for all Americans. I mean he paid the price for all with a bullet in his head. But for some reason, people are using the civil rights leader's legacy in negative ways. Last time, there was a controversy over the MLK Twerk Fest.

Now it's about the "freed Negro" using King for a gun ad.

"Freed Negro" Colion Noir is the racist right's excuse for being "not racist". He make a long rant about how Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is this big supporter of gun rights.

Yeah, let's take a look into this one.



Hey buddy, we all agree that King was looking forward to having a gun. After all in the South, the racist right was hoping they could put a bullet in him. It's a shame they've gotten that opportunity on that early Memphis morning.

Most of "us Black folk" are often asked to give up our guns because according to your NRA buddies, we're the ones robbing and killing people. After all those so-called liberal mayors wants to keep guns off the streets. They look at those "Black groups" standing near a corner and they call it a "gang".

I mean don't Bikers carry guns?

Don't White extremists carry guns?

Don't you folks often have a man who has extreme views and mentioned around you that there's a possibility that he could just "take them all out"?

Yeah, freed Negro Mr. Colion Noir, you believe in the Second Amendment.

I do as well!

I also believe in reasonable gun control. I mean how many of these innocent young people died because of a firearm. We just had a shooting at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana and one at the University of Oklahoma in Norman.

The Second Amendment protects the right of individual Americans to keep and bear arms regardless of service in a militia. The right is not unlimited and does not prohibit all regulation of either firearms or similar devices.

State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing this right. The Second Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, as part of the first ten amendments comprising the Bill of Rights.

It's sealed in the Constitution. But since it applies to those who believe in the right to bare arms, I guess Blacks, Hispanics and Muslims aren't entitled to the benefits of being firearm owners. Of course, cops hate to see us with them.

Whenever I get pulled over by law enforcement, I often tell the officer I'm a concealed carry owner.

They call for a second or third officer to watch what I do. I must put my hands on the wheel whenever I get pulled over. At most times, even in the possibility of me causing some infraction on the state ordinances or laws, I still have to watch what I do whenever I get pulled over.

In my mind, I might get a bullet in me if I make a move.

Oftentimes, most police officers have to watch how they deal with people of color. At best, most police officers are expecting a confrontational Black person. That's why when there's a group of Blacks in a vehicle and there is some traffic infraction (i.e. loud music, tinted windows or failure to signal), the police officers' hands are on their holster.

Adam Winkler, a UCLA professor notes that, after King's house was bombed in 1956, the clergyman applied in Alabama for a concealed carry permit. Local police, loathe to grant such permits to African-Americans, deemed him “unsuitable” and denied his application. Consequently, King would end up leaving the firearms at home.

The lesson from this incident is not, as some NRA members have tried to suggest in recent years, that King should be remembered as a gun-toting Republican.

Yeah, they've considered him the Republican savior!

The racist right often would call him a troublemaker, an adulator, a phony preacher, and even the offensive NIGGER. Some on the racist right would rather not celebrate King day because who would award a "race-baiter" a national holiday.

Ronald Reagan was against the notion of the holiday in the beginning. He and many of this "Freed Negro's" friends are against the notion of giving a Black man a holiday.

Senators Jesse Helms and John Porter East (both North Carolina Republicans) led opposition to the bill and questioned whether King was important enough to receive such an honor. Helms criticized King's opposition to the Vietnam War and accused him of espousing "action-oriented Marxism".

Helms led a filibuster against the bill and on October 3, 1983, submitted a 300-page document to the Senate alleging that King had associations with communists. New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan declared the document a "packet of filth", threw it on the Senate floor and stomped on it.

President Ronald Reagan originally opposed the holiday, citing cost concerns. He later signed the measure, after it passed with a 338 to 90 margin in favor in the House of Representatives. Note Reagan vetoed against the holiday.

Sen. John McCain (Republican of Arizona) voted against the creation of the holiday to honor King, and later defended Arizona Republican Governor Evan Mecham's rescission of the state holiday in honor of King created by his Democratic predecessor. After his opposition grew increasingly untenable, McCain reversed his position, and encouraged his home state of Arizona to recognize the holiday despite opposition from Mecham.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, McCain was criticized for his initial opposition to the measure.

But yet, these Republicans claim King was one of their own.

The Stallmigos would have opposed it as well. Think about how Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) are against the holiday as well.

So Mr. Freed Negro, you're argument to say King would endorse more guns on the street is false.

Mr. Freed Negro, hey could you talk to Bobby Seale about firearms?

Black Republican Wants Obama To "Hang Out!"

Black Republican goes to the social networks to show his supporters how to lose an election.

Last night the internet was buzzing about that idiot former Alaskan governor taking to the social networks to attack President Barack Obama on King Day for being a "race-baiter". She urges him to stop "race-baiting".

But wait a minute, Mama Grizzly (aka Palin Da Ass) and her cubs are throwing them shots at the president.

The junk food media picks up on one of those so-called "freed" Black folks telling the president that he should be hanging by a rope. He claims that the president should be tried for treason.

So if the president would betray his country, a country that he swore to protect as the leader of the free world. A man who fought an onslaught of hatred and outright racist attacks from those who claim they're "patriots".


If they actually were patriots, they wouldn't say that our president should suffer harm from national or foreign threats. But since we live in a country where you're freedom of speech is assured. He can say whatever he wants but note that if evidence was determined he was to carry out that threat, he could get a visit from the United States Secret Service. The threatening of the president, vice president and their families is a CLASS THREE FELONY. It carries up to 5 years in the iron college or federal time out. You may pay up to $250,000 in penalties.

"Freed Negro" Joshua Black, who is running for the Florida state house send a few nasty shots at the president.

According to the Tampa Bay Times, the "freed negro" for Florida House District 68 said President Barack Obama should be hanged for war crimes.

So the Tea Party isn't racist!

"I'm past impeachment," Joshua Black wrote on Twitter. "It's time to arrest and hang him high."

The tweet caught the attention of Chris Latvala, a Republican candidate for House District 67. Pretty much a Republican setting his own up.

Latvala broke the Ronald Reagan rule of not attacking your fellow Republican.

"You aren't seriously calling for the killing of Obama are you?" Latvala replied. "I know you are crazy but good heavens. U R an embarrassment."

Latvala added: "I make it my business when so called GOP candidates become an embarrassment to my beloved party."

Black, 31, of Pinellas Park moved to Florida in 2007 after practicing street evangelism in St. Louis and works as a taxi driver. According to his campaign website, Black entered politics in 2012 when he tried influencing the presidential primary.

The website says: "Republicans have a serious communication problem. Everything we say sounds like spears."

Hours after the tweet, Black defended his comment. Obama should be held responsible for ordering a drone strike that killed a U.S. citizen overseas, he said.

"He should be executed for treason," Black said. "I think the appropriate punishment is death. They killed Benedict Arnold. (Obama) shouldn't be allowed to kill Americans without a trial."

Mama Grizzly should have checked on one of her cubs.

The political newcomer said he doesn't fear U.S. Secret Service agents showing up on his doorstep. Many voters might agree with his position, he said, adding: "I guess they're going to call me a racist now."

After talking to a reporter, Black posted a lengthy message to supporters on Facebook.

"I make no apologies for saying that the President is not above the People. If ordinary Americans should be executed for treason, so should he."

Pinellas GOP Chairman Michael Guju said Black doesn't know the secret details of the drone strike. "It is impossible to accept this statement," Guju said. "This is wholly unacceptable and unduly provocative."

Black's opponent in the House race, Democratic state Rep. Dwight Dudley, said Black has the right to disagree with Obama's decisions. But he shouldn't call for Obama's hanging. "It's dangerous and unbecoming for someone who wants to lead to call for such violence and extremist action," he said. "Wow. I'm stunned."

Magazine Editor Does Some Chair-Sitting On A Black Model! [NSFW]

Me and S. Baldwin often talk about issues that face all people of color, but none so crazy than what's brewing on the internet.

There a photo circulating around the internet from Garage Magazine.The editor-in-chief is using sitting in a chair and it appears that a half naked Black woman is posing as the chair.

See this picture below, it's pretty..........SMH!



For those who don't know the lingo its called shakes my head.

Clair Summers, the editor of FashionBombDaily.com, alerted us to the unfortunate feature and calls the image an example of "white dominance and superiority, articulated in a seemingly serene yet overtly degrading way."

We couldn't agree more, Although the chair also comes in "white woman", we can't help but filled with anger and frustration over to plague the fashion industry. Free Bethann Hardison's crusade to end racism on the runway to our attempt to educate society over and over and over again about the nonsense that is Blackface-- the stories of racially insensitive absurdity are never ending.

The junk food media wanted to reach out to Dasha Zhukova, the Russian editor-in-chief of Garage magazine and Miroslava Duma the editor of Buro 247 for comment. So far no comment.

Do you have an opinion on the matter?

Let us know!

The Huffington Post reports this on The Black Voices segment.

Conservative Outrage Over Obama's Thoughts On Race!

Conservatives: Did you know that your racist emails are sent to MyRightWingDad.net? That website tracks and post the most offensive emails sent by those on the racist right! Are you that convinced that Obama is the one who panders in racism?

President Barack Obama acknowledges that his second term isn't going so well. He knows that his job approval affects his party's base. The Democrats are scared that they may lose the majority in the Senate.

The New Yorker asks the president about his thoughts on Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and his legacy.

As you know Barack Obama tries to avoid mentioning race. But to conservatives, all day everyday for the president and his merry band of race hustlers.

Bill-O (also known as O'Loofus) is the chief agitator of race hustling.

Do you remember the feud with rappers Snoop Dogg and Ludacris?

Do you remember O'Loofus was asking then candidate Barack Obama about his ties to Jeremiah Wright and his former congregation at Trinity United Church of Christ?

Do you remember the "M-fer I want more ice-tea!" comment?

Do you remember that O'Loofus thought that Black conservatives weren't invited at the March On Washington's 50 year celebration, but in fact they were?

Obama being the first Black president, he knows that his presence in the White House draws the ire of the racist right. The racist right has clearly been aggravated by his reelection. There are some in the conservative junk food media with blinders on.

As you know, his job approval from Whites is extremely low. Three out of 10 support the president.

That's relatively low especially in a nation where 75% of the nation's population is White. But somewhere in the fold is the motivations to why Whites have such an unprecedented hatred of the nation's first Black president.

Some of the parts of the New Yorker included:

Obama’s election was one of the great markers in the black freedom struggle. In the electoral realm, ironically, the country may be more racially divided than it has been in a generation. Obama lost among white voters in 2012 by a margin greater than any victor in American history. The popular opposition to the Administration comes largely from older whites who feel threatened, underemployed, overlooked, and disdained in a globalized economy and in an increasingly diverse country. Obama’s drop in the polls in 2013 was especially grave among white voters. “There’s no doubt that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the idea of a black President,” Obama said. “Now, the flip side of it is there are some black folks and maybe some white folks who really like me and give me the benefit of the doubt precisely because I’m a black President.” The latter group has been less in evidence of late.


“There is a historic connection between some of the arguments that we have politically and the history of race in our country, and sometimes it’s hard to disentangle those issues,” he went on. “You can be somebody who, for very legitimate reasons, worries about the power of the federal government—that it’s distant, that it’s bureaucratic, that it’s not accountable—and as a consequence you think that more power should reside in the hands of state governments. But what’s also true, obviously, is that philosophy is wrapped up in the history of states’ rights in the context of the civil-rights movement and the Civil War and Calhoun. There’s a pretty long history there. And so I think it’s important for progressives not to dismiss out of hand arguments against my Presidency or the Democratic Party or Bill Clinton or anybody just because there’s some overlap between those criticisms and the criticisms that traditionally were directed against those who were trying to bring about greater equality for African-Americans. The flip side is I think it’s important for conservatives to recognize and answer some of the problems that are posed by that history, so that they understand if I am concerned about leaving it up to states to expand Medicaid that it may not simply be because I am this power-hungry guy in Washington who wants to crush states’ rights but, rather, because we are one country and I think it is going to be important for the entire country to make sure that poor folks in Mississippi and not just Massachusetts are healthy.”

Somehow conservatives don't think this email is racist!

Obama’s advisers are convinced that if the Republicans don’t find a way to attract non-white voters, particularly Hispanics and Asians, they may lose the White House for two or three more election cycles. And yet Obama still makes every effort to maintain his careful, balancing tone, as if the unifying moment were still out there somewhere in the middle distance. “There were times in our history where Democrats didn’t seem to be paying enough attention to the concerns of middle-class folks or working-class folks, black or white,” he said. “And this was one of the great gifts of Bill Clinton to the Party—to say, you know what, it’s entirely legitimate for folks to be concerned about getting mugged, and you can’t just talk about police abuse. How about folks not feeling safe outside their homes? It’s all fine and good for you to want to do something about poverty, but if the only mechanism you have is raising taxes on folks who are already feeling strapped, then maybe you need to widen your lens a little bit. And I think that the Democratic Party is better for it. But that was a process. And I am confident that the Republicans will go through that same process.”

Ain't like Ronald Reagan used Marines for umbrella service! 

For the moment, though, the opposition party is content to define itself, precisely, by its opposition. As Obama, a fan of the “Godfather” movies, has put it, “It turns out Marlon Brando had it easy, because, when it comes to Congress, there is no such thing as an offer they can’t refuse.”

That subject got the conservative agitators upset. Especially That Guy Who Helped Obama Win.

He was on his right wing carnival radio program complaining about New York's Democratic governor Andrew Cuomo's support for women's rights and hsi endorsement of ban on semi-automatic weapons in the wake of Sandy Hook and the killing of law enforcement in his state.


He and King Hippo as well as That Guy Who Throws Shit To The Wall made it a point to complain and whine about how the president is the one playing the race-card.

So whenever they make a talking point out of a local news event say a White man being beaten up by a bunch of young Black teenagers, you thank them!

Anyway the Media Research Center, a conservative media watchdog group claims that the president is playing the race card to trump up job approval.

The Newsbusters crew are already at work claiming that it was a "lovefest" for Obama.

Tom Blumer wrote that his points about how Obama is lying about the numerous attacks on him cause of his race. He even went after the Affordable Care Act as an example to prove that conservatives aren't racist.

Bloomer wrote, it's totally predictable results of the Obama administration's [failed liberal policies]. The Obama reelection campaign in 2012 effectively stroking the racial divide in so many ways. There's enough proof of that in the actions, inactions, and statements of Attorney General Eric Holder alone, but there is of course much, much more.

[The drop down] a dozen or so points in the polls without a quite diverse group of people turning on you. Gallup's January 6-12 polling results show 39%, 39%, and 36% approval among the 30-49, 50-64, and 65-plus age groups, respectively. In other words, Obama's getting weak approval across the board from Americans over 30. Your "largely from older whites" claim is horse manure. There's plenty of disapproval to go around.

[The New Yorker failed] to point out that Obama is not really "black," as in "African-American." But more to the point in popular perception, what matters far more than Obama's race, which is the same as it was 14 months ago, are his broken "if you like your plan-doctor-medical provider-drug regimen, you can keep them" guarantees and the disastrous, still security-compromised rollout of HealthCare.gov and many of the state exchanges.

[Obama, this guy who] supposedly an "enormous brain" who has been "bored to death his whole life" because what ordinary people do just isn't that challenging, this is really a dumb statement. As a friend asked me earlier today, in essence, "How many kids are going to become aware of this and decide that pot isn't so bad — after all, this guy become president!"

Okay, this second conservative outrage of the year.

What's your thoughts on they're latest outrage of all things Obama?

A Chair Made To look Like A Black Women...WTF????

Disgusting and racist. Racist conservative women felt entitled to do racist/sexist things to Black women without consequence. I don't understand Sistas' alliance with racist conservative women. Those women had the same mindset as their men. They think they're superior to us.

Once again, the image is racist and degrading.

SargeWP BLACK WOMEN & WHITE MEN 11th Feb 13

That Federal Judge Richard Cebull Was A D*ck!

Former federal judge sent racist emails to his friends. Sent an offensive email targeting President Barack Obama.

The American justice system would be better off without this individual on the federal bench.

It was proven that former U.S. District Court judge Richard Cebull was acting a damn fool on the internet.

Back in 2012, this asshole of a judge went forth and sent an offensive and yes racist email targeting President Barack Obama.

In 2012, Cebull used his official courthouse email address to forward to seven friends an email containing a racially charged joke about President Barack Obama. In the joke, "A little boy said to his mother; 'Mommy, how come I'm black and you're white?' His mother replied, 'Don't even go there Barack! From what I can remember about that party, you're lucky you don't bark!'" 

Cebull said he "didn't send it as racist," but rather "sent it out because it's anti-Obama."

Cebull got served a misconduct complaint against himself with the Ninth Circuit and sent a letter of apology to Obama and his family. The Crow Tribal Legislature and a New York Times editorial called for his resignation or impeachment.

U.S. Courts spokeswoman Karen Redmond said Cebull will take senior status March 18, 2013. Cebull took reduced caseload but will still draw a salary and can keep a staff. It was announced that Judge Cebull will retire, concluding the misconduct investigation begun by his own self-report.

He fully retired on May 3, 2013.

The Associated Press reports that the council's March 2013 order reprimanding Cebull was released for the first time Friday by the Judicial Conference of the United States.

An order from a panel of federal judges after his retirement on the findings of a misconduct investigation into U.S. District Judge Richard Cebull was moot because the judge resigned.

The 9th Circuit council condemned Cebull's email practices and ordered him to issue a second public apology. The panel also evaluated Cebull's record on the bench, examining his sentencing. It found no fault with his treatment of cases.

However, it found that Cebull had violated canons 2 and 5 of the judicial code of conduct, which mandates that a judge "should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety" and is prohibited from political activity.

An email search of the former judge's account dated back to 2008. The judicial council said it found hundreds of questionable email sent from the court email account. The emails were identified by categories that included:

"Showed disdain and disrespect for liberal political leaders"

Race-related emails that "showed disdain for African Americans and Hispanics, especially those who are not in the United States legally"

"Emails related to religion (that) showed disdain for certain faiths"

"Emails concern(ing) women and/or sexual topics and were disparaging of women"

"Emails contain(ing) inappropriate jokes relating to sexual orientation"

"Emails related to pending legislation or an issue that could come before the courts, such as immigration, gun control, civil rights, health care or environmental matters."

While the panel said it found hundreds of emails that fit these categories, nowhere in the 35-page release does it give a precise number.

A special judicial review committee of the 9th Circuit Court also traveled to Montana to conduct interviews with more than 25 witnesses, including court staff and social acquaintances of Cebull.

"The witnesses' statements were generally consistent and in the aggregate there was praise for Judge Cebull's conduct on the bench," the report states. "A few witnesses commented that given the small number of judges in the District of Montana and the close-knit legal community, lawyers might be reluctant to make negative comments about Judge Cebull, even anonymously."

The report notes that in some cases, Cebull appeared to go out of the way to make accommodations for some groups.

"A number of witnesses who were friendly with Judge Cebull commented that they thought he made extra efforts to be fair and accommodate Native Americans, including regularly approving their request to conduct traditional rituals while incarcerated," the report said.

The committee also looked at Cebull's cases, paying attention to sentencing practices, civil rights cases and appeals. The U.S. Sentencing Commission provided detailed information on Cebull's practices, dating back to 2005.

"The special committee thoroughly examined Judge Cebull's sentencing practices with respect to particular crimes and ethnic groups, and found no evidence of bias against nonwhite defendants."

When the special judicial review committee met with Cebull, he "acknowledged the seriousness of the issue and did not attempt to minimize or explain it away."

When discussing it, he told the committee that "his 'public shaming has been a life-altering experience.'"

Before retiring, Cebull sent an apology to President Barack Obama, traveled to every division of the District of Montana and met with court staff to apologize for his actions.

Cebull began his judicial career first as a magistrate judge in Great Falls from 1998 to 2001, then as a district judge beginning in July 2001. He was nominated for the district judgeship in the Billings division by President George W. Bush. Cebull served as chief judge from 2008 until March, when he went on senior status.

Before becoming a judge, Cebull worked in private practice with a Billings firm, Brown, Gerbase, Fulton, Harman & Ross, from 1972 to 1997.

Born in Billings and raised in Roundup, Cebull received a bachelor’s degree from Montana State University in 1966 and a law degree from the University of Montana in 1969.