Smearing the name of the victim is practically the issue here with conservatives.
Again, an unarmed teenager heads to his father's home gets confronted by a volunteer neighborhood watcher. There was an altercation and then a gunshot. There lies a dead body and a man who claimed the individual was "acting suspiciously" and he was using "self-defense" since the idiot got his head bruised up.
The police let him go and the family of the victim turn to the junk food media to get the case out there.
Now here we are at the peak of the trial and many WHITE people (and those who are politically conservative) already thinking too ahead of themselves in this trial. Some think the idiot would walk.
Wonder how they've determined that notion?
How about a segment of tabloid gossip from the likes of one reclusive conservative agitator?
In the Sanford, Florida shooting trial of that idiot the junk food media has broken the bounds of race, class and political standings.
We here at Journal de la Reyna seen how the junk food media portrayed the teenager as the "aggressor".
We seen how the country's most controversial agitators rush to judgement in how this trial goes. If the trial by media crowd believes that idiot would walk, then you're not really understanding the premise of this situation.
The most controversial headline grabbers from That Guy Who Throws Shit To The Wall.
No comments:
Post a Comment