Google: Nigger Or Obama!

The Republican Party is becoming a majority White political party. And yet these notions that spread through the online community from Republicans and their allies in the conservative movement is the tired excuse! What they're saying is basically Blacks voting for Barack Obama regardless of his policies. And yet, these are the ones who insert race into every argument especially since the president is a Black man. The Republicans dog whistle issues to rile up White voters. And White voters are sponging it up! They're riled up by conservative talk radio, Fox News, The Drudge Report, World Net Daily, word of mouth, and political views that aren't similar to the president. White voters who are conservative harbor bigoted views towards race, gender, sexuality, nationality, religion, political and economic standings. They use this as a factor to why they hate the president and the Black community.

Google Nigger or Obama! 

You'll find a ton of things in relations to the 2012 U.S. Presidential Race. 

The Republicans are going to play the deck from the bottom up! They know that Whites are more pessimistic of President Barack Obama. 

Race is a major factor to White voters. The president's most harshest critics are White voters. They are influenced by the angry rhetoric of conservative talk radio, people in the news, word of mouth and simple political views that aren't similar to the president. 

White conservative males are likely to agitate the Black community with rhetoric that paints this group as an enemy and the agitator as a patriot. White conservative males are likely to have a bigoted view of a person based on race, gender, sexuality, nationality, religion, political or economic standings. White conservative males flock to conservative forums and online hate websites to vent off frustration. These forums could inspire a disturbed individual to kill in the name of conservatism.

You will notice that some of the most harshest critics refuse to acknowledge him as by his proper title, President Barack Obama. Many white voters are injected by the divisiveness and division that drives them to opposing the president. No matter what people tell them, they'll find some reason to fault the president regardless.

And don't act like I didn't tell you! You got conservatives believing that Blacks vote solely on race. They are fixated on trying to deny their arrogance and pure bigotry.

Guess why it's more difficult for Whites to vote for the president!

It isn't because of big government, socialism!

It's not because he's too liberal or too conservative!

It isn't because he supports traditionally red meat issues like raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires.

It isn't because he endorsed gay marriage.

It isn't because he compromised to get health care reformed passed or regulations to prevent Wall Street from collapsing.

It isn't because he takes vacations.

It isn't because he's capable to taking on issue like the war on terrorism or taking responsibility for issues that affect his administration.

Former Republican presidential candidates Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum have riled up White voters with dog whistle politics. The Republicans and conservatives have played the deck from the bottom up! They're actively riling White voters to oppose the president.

It's because he Black and the Republicans and its allies in the conservative movement would rather rile up White voters with dog whistle politics. In states that vote traditionally Republican, some of the most conservative Democrats would rather vote for perennial candidate serving time in a federal prison than support President Barack Obama.

Again, this is a reason why conservatism is rooting in the bigotry of race, gender, sexuality, religion, nationality, language, political and economic standings.

Conservatives rather cheer for failure! Then get all upset and scream at the fact, things are succeeding!

The New York Times written an interesting article that will have the Right upset yet again. But the point of the article is to finally acknowledge that race is a factor in why White voters oppose the president.

New York Times reporter Seth Stephens-Davidowitz wrote that Barack Obama won 52.9 percent of the popular vote in 2008 and 365 electoral votes, 95 more than he needed. Many naturally concluded that prejudice was not a major factor against a black presidential candidate in modern America. He researched a comparison of Americans’ Google searches and their voting patterns, found otherwise. Proven that if results are correct, racial animus cost Obama many more votes than we may have realized.

The conditions under which people use Google online, most likely alone, not participating in an official survey are ideal for capturing what they are really thinking and feeling. You may have typed things into Google that you would hesitate to admit in polite company. Stephens-Davidowitz have concluded that its certainly have.

The majority of Americans have as well: we Google the word “porn” more often than the word “weather.”

From 2008 onward, “Obama” is a prevalent term in racially charged searches.

The state with the highest racially charged search rate in the country was West Virginia. Other areas with high percentages included western Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio, upstate New York and southern Mississippi.

Republicans are driven to extremism over the president's race!

Seth Stephens-Davidowitz acknowledge that if his findings are correct, race could very well prove decisive against Obama in 2012. Most modern presidential elections are close. Losing even two percentage points lowers the probability of a candidate’s winning the popular vote by a third. And prejudice could cost Obama crucial states like Ohio, Florida and even Pennsylvania.

There is the possibility, of course, that racial prejudice will play a smaller role in 2012 than it did in 2008, now that the country is familiar with a black president. Some recent events, though, suggest otherwise. He mentioned earlier that the rate of racially charged searches in West Virginia was No. 1 in the country and that the state showed a strong aversion to Obama in 2008. It recently held its Democratic presidential primary, in which Obama was challenged by a convicted felon. The felon, who is white, won 41 percent of the vote.

In 2008, Barack Obama rode an unusually strong tail wind. The economy was collapsing. The Iraq war was unpopular. Republicans took most of the blame. He was able to overcome the major obstacle of continuing racial prejudice in the United States. In 2012, the tail wind is gone; the obstacle likely remains.

This Is What Your Congress Is Doing! More GOP Witch Hunts To Damage Obama!

Congressman Darrell Issa (R-California) and Attorney General Eric Holder. The Republicans witch hunt against President Barack Obama. The Republicans are trying to rile up white voters with these ridiculous issues such as the Operation Fast & Furious issue in which a U.S. border agent was killed after drug lords used firearms they've purchased at gun shows and the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms agency failed at monitoring their movements.

 
The Republican Party has made it clear that they want to make Barack Obama serve one term.

They're so fixated on trying to ruin the economy, they don't care who they hurt. Their allies in the conservative movement rather attack and defame the allies that support the president.  The Republicans and its allies in the conservative movement rather waste their time on culture wars instead of solving problems. They are rooting for a civil war within our borders. And yes, they're some members who are willing to shoot and kill for conservative causes.

The Republicans have riled up white voters to oppose President Barack Obama. They try to make groups turn against one another.

In the latest distraction with the war against President Barack Obama, here comes a rehash of an old controversy that should have been put to rest the first time. This is like the umpteenth time.

This ridiculous Operation Fast & Furious controversy is another waste of time distraction created by the Republican Party. The Republicans have collective memory loss.

Attorney General Eric Holder, the first Black appointed federal law enforcement chief is under fire by these idiots in Congress over a tragedy that involved the death of a border agent.

Republican Congressman Darrell Issa (R-California) has made it clear that he's invested in this Operation Fast & Furious. The congressman has subpenaed Holder over five times to testify.

Congessman Issa thinks that the U.S. Justice Department has held back documents that could indict members of Holder's inner circle.

According to CBS, the conservative reporter Sheryl Attkisson stated that the House Oversight Committee will vote next week on whether to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress. It's the fourth time in 30 years that Congress has launched a contempt action against an executive branch member.

The Justice Department has maintained it has cooperated fully with the congressional investigation, turning over tens of thousands of documents and having Holder testify to Congress on the topic at least eight times.

Issa says the Justice Department can still put a stop to the contempt process at any time by turning over the subpoenaed documents.


If the House Oversight Committee approves the contempt citation, the matter would likely be scheduled for a full House vote.


For several weeks, there has been closed-door discussions and debate among House Republicans as to whether to move forward with contempt. Some have expressed concern that it could distract from the Republican's focus on the economy in this election year.

Just like this ridiculous controversy over the allegedly leaks of information in the killing of al-Qaeda members.

Republicans are upset that leaks about the president's steadfast strategy to take on the conservative Sunni militant group. They want to know who leaked out the information and they're pointed fingers at the president.

The Republicans are weak on terrorism. They've been highly upset that members of al-Qaeda are being picked off quickly by the leaked documents of  "target kills". The president approved of CIA drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen.

Republicans are not concern with success, they'll try to find failure.

The president has worked to fix these problems and yet the Republicans are trying to distract by saying none of his policies are working. As Europe is working on their solutions to fix the economy, they wait on the leading nations like the United States and China to come up with solutions. The Republicans aren't going to support anything the president proposes. The Democrats and the president aren't going to agree on major austerity cuts to domestic programs that help the lower and middle class.

The Republicans scream over achievements President Barack Obama. They cheer when things are failing.

You see they have a candidate they're not satisfied with. They hate Mitt Romney. But you better believe the Republicans are energized and willing to accept a "moderate" like Romney then suffer another term of President Barack Obama. They've been working on gotcha moments to rile up the conservative base.

I am getting really fed up with Congress. They need to pass laws that will fix the economy. Not waste time on trying to witch hunt and distract voters with legislation that could screw up the country.

I've said before and I'll say it again: [They] cheer for failure! Scream at success!

Courtesy of CBS News

Defending The Dollar!

           
This is a big scandal in the religious world. Crefelo Dollar a mega church pastor who attracts millions of people worldwide is involved in a scandal.

The World Changers Church International located in College Park, Georgia outside of Atlanta. The mega church he founded in the 1980s attracts worshipers. And yes, he's gonna need Jesus Christ in order to help him get out a crisis in the family home.

Dollar was arrested in Fayetteville, Georgia on charges of allegedly attacking his 15-year-old daughter. The initial report stated Dollar's 15-year-old daughter accused him of choking her, throwing her to the ground, and spanking her with his shoe. The official charges were simple battery and cruelty to children, both misdemeanors. He was later released on a $5000 bail.

On his program, he vehemently denied that he hit his daughter and called the charges false and discriminatory.

The followers have defended him and they're claiming that the young girl and her sister are lying to shame their father.

Now, I am agnostic and I haven't been to church in awhile. I always felt that those in the church are trying to push their radical views upon me and prop me up as a "turn around" to the faith.

I thought that religion is a tax free money maker. Anyone can claim they studied the teachings of a religion.

Do you think these mega-church pastors preach the word?


No.

No one is perfect.

I don't want to make any judgement to say that Creflo Dollar is a violent person or he was wrongly accused of an issue.

But it comes to light of many other scandals plaguing Dollar. He was once investigated by the U.S. Senate for allegedly using his religious teaching to make himself a wealthy man.

This brings back the sex scandal plaguing fellow preacher Eddie Long. Long was accused of sexually harassing and sleeping with former male members of his church. They sued the pastor and some settled out of court with the pastor. The pastor is facing a separation from his wife.

Dollar and Long both preach for profit. They're rich! They can thank GOD for making them successful!

Republicans: We're Gonna Do Something [After We Defeat Obama]!

                     

If you think that sabotaging the economy was the plan of President Barack Obama, you're a stupid person!


Republicans and their allies in the conservative movement are focused solely on trying to defeat the president and those who support him.


They're so focused on trying to pass these ridiculous domestic austerity cuts to social safety nets that could help the middle class.


According to the Dayton Daily News, many lawmakers measure progress in repealing or rolling back existing laws.

Last July, the House voted to roll back key provisions of the Clean Water Act.

In February, it voted to roll back two Department of Education regulations, including guidelines state officials are required to follow when operating a school.

And in May, the House voted to undo the same sweeping mandatory Defense cuts that it agreed to accept during last year’s Budget Control Act.

That doesn’t include various attempts to undo the 2010 health care law, which was enacted under the Democratic-majority Congress.

Congress is already on track to pass fewer laws than any previous Congress in at least 40 years. To date, this Congress has passed 123 public laws with just six months left in the legislative calendar.

During the last Congress, which lasted from 2009 to 2010, 383 laws were passed. In the one before that, it was 460. No Congress in recent memory has come close to the slow pace of lawmaking exhibited by the current group of lawmakers.

There are reasons, observers say, including the two political parties’ inability to get along. But some of the inactivity speaks to a changing philosophy among many in Congress. Making law is no longer a priority.

The president made a comment about the private sector doing fine, and Republicans pounced on it.


Republican candidate Mitt Romney has went forth to push the notion that there's no need for firefighters, police officers and teachers. The Republicans agree with this notion.


Romney criticized the president by saying: “His answer for economic vitality…was, of course, pushing aside the private sector, which he said is doing fine.  Instead, he wants to add more to government!”


“He says we need more firemen, more policemen, more teachers. Did he not get the message in Wisconsin? The American people did. It’s time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.”


President Barack Obama must go after the Republicans. They're screwing up the country in the name of these ridiculous culture wars.

Do We Really Want This Guy?

Can Mitt Romney beat President Barack Obama? Some say yes!

 
Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts is the Republican who is going to face President Barack Obama in the general election.

Romney has secured enough delegates to clinch the nomination. After a bitter primary fight against his Republican rivals, Romney managed to beat back harsh criticism of his stances of being a moderate politician.

Romney has focused solely on the economy. The economic crisis in Europe has trickled into North America.

The United States has maintained steady growth but it's waning. The U.S. Congress hasn't compromised on a work and infrastructure bill that could activate the job market.

Romney served as governor of Massachusetts for one term (2003 - 2007) and during that time, many felt that his term was a disaster. But the same could be felt by the nation when it comes to President Barack Obama.

Mitt Romney is painted as the most weakest candidate by most in political circles. But President Barack Obama is painted as the weak president, because of his job approval and the U.S. Congress in constant gridlock.

Many Republicans will ignore Mitt Romney's inconstancy, his religion and his awful gaffes. They just want a man capable of beating the president.

Republicans spent most of the three years standing against most of the policies that the president presented to the Congress.

They're screaming where's the jobs! But when jobs are coming back and people are feeling better about the economy, Republicans are crowing that the president is cooking the books and lying to the public.

Mitt Romney embraces the Paul Ryan Austerity Bill. Austerity means major cuts in order to balance a federal budget.

Many Americans who view Fox News or read The Drudge Report have recited many talking points from conservative activists, and they're focused on issues that aren't important.

Many Democrats are cautiously thinking that the race will be a nail bitter but they're confident that President Barack Obama can defeat the Republican nominee.

Is there any thoughts to why a candidate who has track record of loses capable of beating the president.

Can the boring guy beat a rock star?

Courtesy of YouTube

Hannity Whines About Civility! Turd Flipper Michelle Malkin Debates Liberal Straw Woman Over Sexism!

Michelle Malkin and Sean Hannity once again get riled up over some issue that has them blaming President Barack Obama again! The nonstop agitation from these two kind of makes me wonder if they're secretly rooting for the president to win reelection. After all they need President Obama to keep their "cash cow" flowing!

What does Sean Hannity and Michelle Malkin know about freaking civility?

Not damn thing.

They relish in division and hate for a profit.

See I don't have to be civil to anyone either. We don't live in a world of civility! It's a dog eat dog world and I am in it too! I can call these buffoons out for being the lying idiots they are!

Again, it's almost like everyday these two make confrontational debates over issues in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. I swear, I think they secretly want Barack Obama to win!

Why?

Because the president is a cash cow to conservatives! They make a living off of making people mad at one another just to sell books, events or even boaster up television/radio ratings!

Sean Hannity has seen a steady increase in viewership of his television program. Hannity is the go to guy for Republicans and controversial figures in the media.

Malkin wrote three books in regards to President Barack Obama. They were best sellers.

Malkin reluctantly endorsed former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and warned him to go hard on the president or face her wrath.

Sean Hannity will always be a bullshitter of the conservative movement! He studied the media well!

He goes into a nonstop repetitive talking point that his viewers sponge up and repeat word for word!

Since we're going through the "silly season" of politics, it would be noted that Hannity allowed this little catfight between the conservative agitator and liberal commentator Sally Kohn go a little too far. Since Sean Hannity takes pride in confrontational debates, he probably got wet dreams over two women fighting over civility in the presidential race.

Sean Hannity never had respect for the president. He claims that he respects the office of the president, but yet makes snide dog whistle comments to rile up extremists. He calls President Barack Obama, the "anointed one" or the "crybaby in chief." That little comment he makes saying the president is the anointed one rings political dog whistle for "that uppity.....[insert racial slur]!"

As a woman of color, Michelle Malkin is by far one of the most nastiest human being to ever be on television. I am assuming that she's practically banned from most cable news outlets except for Fox News! On Fox News, the commentators let Malkin go uninterrupted with baseless lies about an opponent and got the nerve to call the president a "thug" because he criticizes the Republicans and their plans to create austerity measures against the middle class!

She spins like a top over a liberal's criticism of her and her cult. When Malkin gets upset, she normally drops a name, address, website or link to the person she got upset with!

Her followers (cult) takes the bait. In a few moments, you'll see nasty and even down right threatening comments from some of her cult members. Notice that most comments that come from Michelle Malkin's personal blog or Twitchy are usually word salads with at least a name drop of Obama.

This debate was on second hour of the Sean Hannity program.

Michelle Malkin was defending her hardline stance against President Barack Obama. After the liberal Sally Kohn urged her to tone down some of the nasty rhetoric, Malkin goes crazy! She goes into "why it's the other guy" or "I'm the victim" defense while chastising the liberals for doing the same thing.

Michelle Malkin is an internet savvy conservative activist. Her blogs attract over 3 million readers. Malkin and her proteges in waiting have spent time organizing campaigns against a perceived threat to conservatism.

Some notable feuds include her brush with Rachael Ray, a nationally syndicated talk show host. The feud started over a scarf Ray wore in a Dunkin Donuts promotion. Malkin thought the scarf's design resembled a terrorist group's banter! Malkin demanded the donut chain to drop Rachael Ray or suffer a boycott.

She also got into it with Black nationalist, Malik Shabazz of the New Black Panthers when she guest hosted The O'Reilly Factor. Malkin and Shabazz got into a heated debate over the Duke Lacrosse case in which race came into play. The Black nationalist called her out for being a "political prostitute who sold out to her race", Malkin nearly lost it and cut his mic.

Malkin has a temper. A major factor to why she's like this. She love attention! She can't deny her popularity as a loud obnoxious conservative agitator who turd flips over the most trivial things in America.

Malkin would lose her temper over a minor suggestion to tone it down!


Andrew Breitbart died of heart failure. And yes, he was just like her.

Courtesy of Mediaite and The Sean Hannity Show. The Sean Hannity Show is a part of Premiere Networks and Cumulus Media Group.

Money Talks!

Mitt Romney's monthly fundraising surpassed President Barack Obama. The Republicans are determined to make this a big money race. The Republicans are energized after the victory of Scott Walker in Wisconsin.

The Obama Presidential Campaign has a strong fundraising operation. He better be prepared for the Romney campaign, and the allies! The Republican nominee Mitt Romney is catching up and it's going to be a big money race!

The May figures say that the Romney Presidential Campaign and the Republican National Committee raised over $76 million in cash. The Obama Presidential Campaign and the Democratic Party raised about $60 million.

It looks like the ride is going to be a lot tougher for the embattled president. With the economy being the number one problem facing Americans, President Barack Obama must continue to push the message that he has created jobs and he's working to help middle Americans.

The Republicans are energized by the victory of Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin. The conservative pushed forth this notion that the public sector unions, the lower class who depend on welfare, food stamps and entitlements are screwing up the nation. They want to cut these programs that provide safety nets for those who are struggling. They are practically rooting for a global recession.

President Barack Obama has a stronger advantage with cash on hand. He carries over $105 million. Former governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney carries over $10 million. He will catch up with the president soon.

The Republicans are seizing upon the notion that the president's policies are failing. The Republicans offered austerity bills that could derail the economic progress. They refuse to pass an infrastructure bill that could help construction workers build highways and homes. The Republicans would rather try to pass legislation that could restrict voter's rights, women's rights and enable firearms in public buildings (i.e. hospitals).

They'll waste the rest of the year trying to screw up this country so they can regain power.

People are so fixated on blaming the president for an economic crisis that he inherited. The American public is so freaking impatient when it comes to things.

Let repeat this again! The president's foes were complaining that he was slated to raise nearly $1 billion in campaign fundraising. They were all up in arms about it. Now that Mitt Romney managed to raise slightly more in fundraising, the same foes of the president are crowing about it.

The only things to worry about the U.S. Presidential Elections is two things.

If you support President Barack Obama, Mitt Romney's pick for vice president and how he can debate the president are the only things people should be concerned about.

When the fundraising runs in favor of the Romney campaign, we'll see the president continue to push his supporters to help him win.

Rihanna Karma...

Bill O'Racist Got Honest (Sort Of)

Bill O'Reilly Supports Racial Profiling

Conservative Turd Flippers Want Bloodshed Between The Clintons And Obama!

                
                    

Michelle Malkin is the internet savvy conservative activist who created her own personal blog, Hot Air and Twitchy. She gets a lot of airplay on Fox News with her good ole buddy, serial name dropping conservative agitator Sean Hannity.

Malkin comes off as a hostile debater. I am assuming that she's a very nice person in public when the cameras aren't rolling! But as right now, I look at her as the most nastiest person of color to ever speak anything about President Barack Obama.

I've expect this crap coming from bullshitters like Sean Hannity, but Malkin is way worse when it comes to being an agitator to President Barack Obama.

I almost think that these conservatives fake outrage to sell books. Because if you look at how many books were written by conservatives, the numbers are in and they're high.

Three conservative agitators obsessing over President Barack Obama.

They make millions of dollars trying to make me and you and thousands of others angry over issues that don't affect the general public.

These two along with former presidential candidate Herman Cain, were turd flipping over the latest crap coming out of former Clinton advisor (conservative agitator) Dick Morris' mouth.

Morris stated that former president Bill Clinton is showing his displeasure with President Obama. Morris claims that Mr. Clinton is going to make it his goal to sabotage this election so Hillary Clinton can win in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections.
 
The Republicans would love to muddy up the waters between former president Bill Clinton and the president. This is another waste of time distraction and a rehash of the 2008 U.S. Presidential Elections.

President Obama and former president Clinton both appeared together at fundraisers for Democratic candidates.

What got the conservative noise machine cranking is the recent statements from the former president.

Mr. Clinton goes on television to state his opinion about the election, the conservatives seize upon some of his comments and uses them as proof that President Obama's agenda isn't working.

Sean Hannity claims that he knows people in the Clinton camp so angry over the 2008 Democratic Primaries, they wouldn't mind seeing President Barack Obama fail.

Former Clinton aide Dick Morris makes the rounds as a conservative agitator. His ongoing feuds with the Clintons spawned him to write books about them. Morris is targeting President Obama by spreading the gospel of feuding between him and the Clintons.

Now I don't take Hannity at his word. He's a natural born liar and deceiver. He has one serious case of Obama Derangement Syndrome.

But let's look at those so called people Mr. Hannity knows:

James Carville? Isn't he married to conservative agitator Mary Matlin?

Paul Begala? Isn't he one of those skeptical Clinton aides who think that the Obama policies are causing rifts within the Democratic Party?

Doug Schoen? Isn't he a strategist for Republican candidates and the one endorsing the idea for President Obama to step aside so Hillary Clinton could take over?

Dick Morris? A shady political analysis who has bad blood with the Clintons? A man who spends more time trolling for hookers while writing books?

All of them get equal footing on cable news outlets. Carville and Begala both appearing on CNN and Fox News. Morris and Schoen solely fixtures on Fox News.

I don't know. But it's quite unique that these guys are in the picture. They've been highly critical of President Barack Obama. The president ignores them. With good reason.

They just get a paycheck to rant and rave. With all this agitating, a person will sponge it and take it to the voting booth.

The People For Unity My Ass (PUMA/Clintons 4 Republicans) were disgruntled supporters of Hillary Clinton. They were determined to undermine the Obama campaign by supporting John McCain. This backfired. The brewing of the conservative Tea Party movement came from these types of people. These people make up the conservative wing of the Democratic Party. The so-called Reagan/Hillary Democrats.


The 2008 Democratic Primaries were a first for the history of the political party. An African American man and a woman, running for the nomination for president. Hillary Clinton already had a history as a former first lady and U.S. Senator from New York. Her name was well known among the Democratic faithful. Barack Obama was this U.S. Senator from Illinois who had a funny name, but a eloquent voice and charming looks of a gentleman. They both were running a historical run for the Democratic nomination.

The Democratic nomination was a bitter fight though. Many supporters threaten to vote Republican after both campaigns went negative on one another. Eventually the Democrats worked out their differences and managed to win back the presidency and full control of the Congress.

Since this the 2012 U.S. Presidential Elections, these conservative and liberal agitators will make millions trying to make people say nasty things about President Barack Obama and former governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney.

I don't look at Mitt Romney as a bad person. I think he's a decent person! I just don't like him!

I can tell you that from experience, he comes off as a pompous asshole.

I hate to say that about the guy, but that's the opinion I generated from him when I seen him in 2007.

I was selected to participate to in the 2007 CNN/YouTube Republican Debate at the Excel Center in St. Petersburg, Florida. I shook hands with the former governor and Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas). I got the opportunity to meet actor/trainer Chuck Norris, then supporter of former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee and his wife. I met the former governor Mike Huckbee and his wife Janet. I shook hands with Duncan Hunter, and even booed at Tom Tancrando, the former congressman from Colorado.

Romney and Paul who each tried a run for president back in 2007 - 2008 and both lost to U.S. Senator from Arizona, John McCain.

John McCain eventually went on to lose to Barack Obama in a landslide. McCain who ran in 2000 for president against then Elizabeth Dole, wife of former Kansas senator Bob Dole and then Texas governor George W. Bush.

George W. Bush went on to serve two terms as the president. Elizabeth Dole lost the nomination but went on to run for U.S. Senate in North Carolina. She won and served one term in the U.S. Senate. She lost to Kay Hagen in the 2008 U.S. Election.

Mitt Romney was one of those guys who loves to talk a mean game about an opponent! He lacked clever deliveries to issues. He came off as inconsistent when he takes on issues. Maybe in his mind, its a good idea, but when he's pressured by the extremists within his party, he'll pull back.

Mitt Romney has never brought up a serious economic plan that matches or even betters President Barack Obama.

Mitt Romney will pander to the extremists within in his party to defeat President Obama.

Mitt Romney will claim he'll focus on the economy, but I assure you that the old arguments of 2008 will once again rehash in this election and the Romney campaign will use it against the president.

Note: Herman Cain was a perennial candidate who tried to run for multiple government positions as well.

After allegations of a sex scandal, Cain bowed out before the Iowa caucuses. Cain had went on to endorse Newt Gingrich. But now he's endorsed Mitt Romney. Cain isn't interested in running for office anymore! He will now take the helm of radio conservative agitator Neal Boortz. Boortz will retire and Cain will finish his rants on radio.

I'm guessing the bad blood between Cain and Romney is just old news.

I bet you that Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum are plotting to derail Mitt Romney's presidential bid!

Two can play this game, Mr. Hannity!

Courtesy of Mediaite

Wisconsin Keeps The Koch Sucker!

Wisconsin governor Scott Walker managed to fight off a recall election that could have changed the impact of the Republican's strength in the 2012 United States Presidential Election.

Be prepared for a long summer, President Barack Obama.

The Republicans and its conservative allies are energized by the victory of Wisconsin's embattled governor Scott Walker. For the first time in U.S. history a state governor survives a strong recall election. And the energy will be pass along through that perennial Mitt Romney, the party's nominee for president.

The Democrats retake back the state legislation and Walker urges the opposition to put aside their differences and work with him for the sake of the state. With the growing tension within Wisconsin, could there be a growing signs of strength within the conservative movement?

Scott Walker and the Republican-controlled state legislation passed sweeping measures to limit public sector collective bargaining and cuts to pension for public workers. He signed off a voter identification law that required voters to show a government-issued ID before casting a ballot. His state attorney filed a lawsuit against the federal government, in regards to the American Health Care Reform law. He rejected funding for the health care of the poor. Also, the governor rejected public funding for high speed rail service.

Walker hardline stance against the middle class and public sector unions created the backdrop for the liberal Occupy Wall Street movement.

Despite all this, the voters still came out in droves to vote. And in a 53% to 47%, a mere six points gave the governor a win.

Milwaukee mayor Tom Barrett was not a favorite among the public sector unions and Democratic hopefuls.

He offered a different take on the matters of public unions. He pushed forth ordinances that cut sick days for city workers. Barrett advocated for non-payment work for city employees and advocating cuts to city work.

People weren't as enthusiastic with the mayor.

The recall election was a lost for the public sector unions and the Democratic Party. Even with a strong grassroots presence and appearances from former president Bill Clinton, many voters felt that Governor Walker was still capable of leading the state.

Many conservatives and some Democrats fault President Barack Obama for not appearing for rallies to help the Milwaukee mayor Tom Barrett. But the case in point is, what would it matter?

I mean President Barack Obama appeared for candidates who ran for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts, governor of New Jersey and Virginia and for a congressional seat in New York. They've lost. Conservatives crow that standing near the president is dangerous.

I am assuring that the president was capable of getting involved. But is it worth the risk? The Democrats are very cautious this time! They want the Republicans to play an overreach with their austerity plans. Voters aren't too hip with the Democrats but their hopes is the Republicans go too far and turn off the independent voters. But you would hear the right wingers scream that the president is trying to meddle in the affairs of the voters of Wisconsin. Now that he's not making many appearances out of fear that the candidate may lose, the same right wingers are going to make noise about how he didn't come to the aid of the Democrats.

Look I am all about a fair election and all, and I do wish Governor Walker, a successful three years, but in reality, it's about the math. Many voters felt that this recall was an overreach by the opposition.

Many voters who supported Governor Walker were union workers, middle income families, and even supporters of President Obama.

But the concern among those around President Barack Obama, is Wisconsin going to swing red this time?

Maybe?

The Democrats carry Wisconsin easily for the last elections.

This time around is it going to be a rough ride for the president and the Democrats?

Democrat Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin is running for retiring U.S. Senator Herb Kohl's seat, it's going to be a toss up between her and former Republican governor Tommy Thompson, a 2008 former presidential candidate.

The president is great fundraiser. He's getting donations, but is the impact of the president going to trickle down to those struggling?
 .
The Republicans poured a lot of money into this race. Superpac donations for the Republican governor was unprecedented. Americans for Prosperity, American Crossroads and U.S. Chamber of Commerce poured millions into the race. The Republicans were hoping that this race was a precursor to a game changing victory for Mitt Romney.

The Koch brothers, are reclusive billionaires invested in the 2012 U.S Presidential race.

Walker was fooled last year by pranksters when he thought a call was from philanthropist David Koch, co-chairman of Koch Industries, a investment and manufacturing firm that supports Republican candidates.

Charles Koch the oldest brother is the CEO of Koch Industries and mostly the head operations of its affiliate firms. Charles Koch donates to Republican and Democratic candidates. He's was once a supporter of Newt Gingrich but switch to Mitt Romney.

Barack Obama has a slim lead in most Midwestern states. He has to carry forth Ohio, Florida, Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada. Those states determine an election. Wisconsin matters. It's a strong union state.

Despite what happen the Republicans can take pride in this victory. This victory is a momentum for Republicans struggling to retake the U.S. Senate. It's also a sigh of relief for Mitt Romney as well. Many people are still skeptical of his chances, but the Republicans can say now that the Scott Walker impact could be a lot better if Mitt Romney goes the way of the governor.

Assured that Scott Walker will be floated around as either a vice-president nominee or 2016 potential candidate for president. Just listen to the whispers around the internet, it's already there!

GOP Defeats Equal Pay Bill!

 

Is there a War on Women?

To the Republican Party, it's just another example of the class warfare the president and the Democratic Party present to the general public to deflect the attention off the economy.

The Republicans love to say that "the president hasn't produced enough jobs!"

What this equal pay law meant to so many women? To those who are unfairly paid by corporations must allow fair treatment. Republicans defeat the bill with 52 -48. There was a Democrat in the opposition too.

What this means is the Republicans aren't concerned with jobs, they're wrapped their asses around the American flag in preparedness of these ridiculous culture wars.