We Need A Person To Vilify!

Republicans need a villain. That's why four years of a future President Kamala Harris is necessary for their grifts.

Splashed on The Drudge Report, the Republican quietly are rooting for Vice President Kamala Harris. The Republicans are starting to have strong concerns that former president Donald J. Trump and Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) will be defeated.

Listening to Sean "Softball" Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Tulsi Gabbard, Roger Stone, Corey Lewandowski, Michael Flynn, Steve Bannon, Donald Trump, Jr., Kimberly Guilfoyle and Fox will doom Trump. I mean we thought it was clinched when Hillary Clinton was the nominee.

We thought Joe Biden was going to be defeated despite a pandemic and racial unrest.

Now its uncertain.

They rather have Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz in the White House so they can spend the next four years vilifying and gaslighting Americans into voting Republican.

Now many Republicans who are elected leaders fear the wrath of Trump and MAGA.

Hell, we haven't heard much from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) lately. Rather, the social media isn't talking about her outrageous behavior now that President Joe Biden dropped out his reelection campaign.

No more talk about Hunter Biden or Tara Reade. No more concerns about Biden's gaffes, his health and impeachment. Now it's about Harris and her laughing, her voice switching or Walz and his military service or his labeling of Republicans as weird.

Calling Republicans weird has really riled them out.

Jonathan Martin wrote some within the GOP are keen to move on from the Trump era, even if they’d never admit it publicly – and, according to the outlet, it’s not just the usual “Never Trump” crowd.

Key individuals that have relayed their concerns in confidence include free-marketeers concerned about Trump’s tariff idea, pro-life lawmakers disconcerted by the former president’s pro-choice remarks and defense hawks worried about his stance on NATO.

One conservative leader told Playbook: “There’s a lot of anxiety about what Trump does to Republican ability to win in 2028 — and what he also may do to the party in terms of policy long-term. There is just this concern that like, ‘OK, if the party just goes in that direction, then what kind of party is it going forward? And can conservatives, then, have a home going forward?’”

Drudge turned on Trump in a big way.

They keep telling Trump to stop name calling and cussing. They tell him to focus on issues and give Republicans something to run on. Trump refuses to stop. He says it's the only way to draw crowds and he depends on their support.

Martin wrote: “the best possible outcome in November for the future of the Republican Party is for Donald Trump to lose and lose soundly.”

He added: “GOP leaders won’t tell you that on the record. I just did.”

Martin digs in on Trump’s antics of the past two weeks, arguing that acts of “routine self-sabotage” show that “the best case for Trump’s defeat may, predictably, be Trump himself.”

The columnist continued: “He’s incoherent on abortion rights, unable even to appear at a cemetery without creating a political mess and is so bothered by those who’ve suffered the wounds of war that he slights Medal of Honor recipients. And, running against a female opponent, he’s pushing blowjob jokes about her and his last female opponent.”

“It won’t be easy to kick the habit,” he added. “But the Republican who forges a hybrid coalition — a modern-day conservative fusionism — between the pre-Trump party and his enthusiasts will be rewarded. No, it can’t be anti-Trump. But it must be post-Trump.”

While a loss could give Democrats more control, some Republicans argue it might give the GOP a better shot in 2026, positioning them to reclaim control of Congress.

“Moving past Trump in the aftermath of another defeat will hardly be easy,” Martin wrote. “But it’s essential if Republicans want to become a viable national party once more.”