Straight From The Source!

If you're not aware, Prince Harry is suing five tabloids for invasion of privacy.

If you're not aware of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and how they address the junk food media, well let me clarify the facts.

Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan rarely speak to the press. They talk to reliable outlets.

If you are calling them friendly, that's fine. At least they have an opportunity to set the record straight whenever they are in the news for some controversy coming from sources who claim to have inside knowledge of the two.

The Sussexes were really angered by The Daily Mail posting images of the prince holding his daughter. They don't promote their children to the junk food media. 

Also, Meghan has not tipped off paparazzi. They have used drones, sat outside their Los Angeles home, have spotters and check a routine schedule of where they go.

There is scandal in England and one of the chief antagonists at The Daily Mail is facing scandal as well. Dan Wooten is accused of catfishing minors. Prince William and Princess Catherine have been spotted arguing. He kicked King Charles III and Queen Camilla out of their Welsh cottage. 

Meghan and Harry have not spoken to the press. Now here's a bonkers rumor.

The Daily Mail claims that the Sussexes asked President Joe Biden for a ride on Air Force One during the state funeral of Queen Elizabeth II. That is ridiculous for the start. 

The prince and duchess stayed in Britain for the services, private funeral and greeted well wishers. Besides they live in California. Why would the U.S. government fly from Britain to Washington, DC and then to California and back?

When King Charles III was coronated, Meghan stayed home. Guess what the junk food media talked about?

They are now getting "sources" that Meghan and Harry are spliting. It's all because of them losing endorsement deals right?

Harry is suing Mail on Sunday publisher Associated Newspapers Ltd. over an article alleging he tried to hush up his separate legal challenge over the British government’s refusal to let him pay for police security.

During a hearing at the High Court in London, Harry’s lead attorney asked Judge Matthew Nickin either to strike out the publisher’s defense or to deliver a summary judgment, which would be a ruling in the prince’s favor without going to trial.

In a written witness statement published Tuesday, Harry said that he felt “as though the tabloid press thought that they owned me absolutely.”

“I genuinely feel that in every relationship that I’ve ever had — be that with friends, girlfriends, with family or with the army, there’s always been a third party involved, namely the tabloid press,” he said.

Hacking — the practice of guessing or using default security codes to listen to celebrities’ cellphone voice messages — was widespread at British tabloids in the early years of this century. It became an existential crisis for the industry after the revelation in 2011 that the News of the World had hacked the phone of a slain 13-year-old girl. Owner Rupert Murdoch shut down the paper and several of his executives faced criminal trials.

Mirror Group has paid more than 100 million pounds ($125 million) to settle hundreds of unlawful information-gathering claims, and printed an apology to phone hacking victims in 2015.

But the newspaper denies or hasn’t admitted any of Harry’s claims, which relate to 33 published articles.