Sunday, June 30, 2019

The Roxbury(Boston) Murders: 40 Years Later: The Estuary Project

11 black women were murdered in Boston 40 years ago. A local artist is remembering them across the city.


These are six of eleven women who were slain in Boston.
They are young and beautiful Black women with futures ahead of them.


The following has been written by a good reporter by the name of Dialynn Dwywer of Boston.com in commemoration of the 40th year anniversary of the Boston Murders.  The unsolved serial murders of Black women have galvanized the Black community and the emergent Black feminist coalition, The Combahee River Collective and many known Black feminists around the country.  They were demanding accountability from the city, the police, and the citizens of Boston regarding the deaths of so many Black women in that city.  They discuss the misogynistic culture as well as the racism Boston is notorious for back in the 70s.

Here's the story of Kindra Hicks who is trying to commemorate the victims by erecting a collage of balloons at various locations where the women were murdered.  

Please read the story below:
______________________________

This is one of several balloon installments throughout Boston in commemoration of the women murdered in 1979

The artist behind the memorial project, Kindra Hicks


Forty years ago, the body of 29-year-old Daryal Ann Hargett was found by her landlord in her South End apartment.
The social worker, who was described as quiet and serious by those who knew her, had been stabbed to death. She was the fifth black woman to be murdered in Boston that year, and she wouldn’t be the last.
By the end of May 1979, the number of women murdered in Boston would rise to 12. All but one were black.
The bodies of the 11 black women — all between the ages of 15 and 34 — were found in Roxbury, Dorchester, Jamaica Plain, the South End, and Back Bay. 
Kendra Hicks, a local artist and community organizer, will remember Hargett’s death on Thursday with a 24-hour art installation near where the 29-year-old’s body was found. Since January, Hicks has been putting up temporary artwork for each of the women who died in the rash of violence 40 years ago.
“One of the things I wanted to pose really was, ‘Who gets memorialized in the city and who’s allowed to be memorialized? Who has monuments erected in their name?’” Hicks told Boston.com.
A Boston native who grew up in Egleston Square, Hicks said she started doing community organizing work in her teens. Through her activism, she began studying black feminists and black feminism, which led her to discover the Combahee River Collective.
“The Combahee River Collective is a black, queer socialist collective that was here in Roxbury from 1974 to 1979, and they were one of the groups of women who basically responded to these murders when they were happening,” Hicks said. “They were creating literature for the women in the neighborhood when these murders were happening.”
It was about a year and a half ago that Hicks said she learned of the string of murders that rocked the black community at the time and decided to create artwork that would commemorate the 40th anniversary of the women’s deaths. With the help of a Kickstarter campaign and a crew of volunteers, she has been designing the installations for the 10-part memorial she calls “The Estuary Projects.”
“This is a guerrilla art project, so we don’t have any permits for them, so we’ve been putting them up and then going in and also taking them down,” Hicks said.
Putting up the artwork without permission is part of her message, she said.
“Taking space out in the city, on purpose in the public and without permission is very intentional as part of the project,” Hicks said. “Because I really do want to say that these black women do deserve to be memorialized.”
The installations go up early on the anniversary of each woman’s death near where they were found and come down 24 hours later.
“The other reason why I wanted to do installations is because the installations are really invitations for people in the community to remember our collective history but also what we survived in our community,” Hicks said. “So I knew that an installation right smack in the middle of where people are walking and spending their regular lives was going to be the way that I was going to be able to invoke that in people. To kind of spark that attention of, ‘Oh, what’s this thing that’s in the middle of my neighborhood and what does it mean?’ I wanted them to be very prominent and I wanted it to be visible and I wanted it to be public and I wanted it to be in the midst of people’s everyday doings.”
Hicks said the project has become very personal for her. She started it off by communicating the names of the 11 victims in the Bay State Banner, hoping she would be able to reach family members and friends of the women.
Then she spent hours reading about the women in newspaper archives — learning how the young women lived and the details of their violent deaths.
“It becomes overwhelming for me because you get to know all these women, and I’m creating an installation for each of these women,” she said. “But you also have to familiarize yourself with how they were taken.”
That impact is why Hicks said each of the installations features an alter and starts with a 9 a.m. ceremony where attendees light candles, say prayers, and sing songs for the victim.
The moment of remembrance is a reflection of her own process through the project, she said.
“There is a political statement that I’m making with these installations,” she said. “But it’s not lost on me that these are people and that these are women whose lives were lost. So the ritual and the ceremony is a way to honor them and to honor them as people who are our ancestors and as people who were taken in these moments.”
As she was developing the project, Hicks heard from the families of two of the women, and then a family friend showed up at one of the installations and was able to connect her to a third family.
“People are stumbling on the installations and being like, ‘Oh I knew this woman or I was around during this time,’” Hicks said. “And they start telling stories and kind of remembering.”
The installations, which run through May, are just the first part of the project.
For part two, Hicks wants to bring people together who were moved by the installations and work together to develop “alternative systems” for the neighborhoods.
“The story of the project for me is that the end of the world has come for black and brown people multiple times again,” Hicks said. “We’ve experienced things that could be considered apocalyptic. Similar to the time that we are in now. We’re having a lot of conversations about what’s happening in the world — climate change, politics, family separation, state violence — and it feels like a lot. Everybody’s kind of like, ‘Oh my God, what’s going on, the world is crumbling around us.’ So the installations are a reminder — no actually we’ve been here before. We’ve survived these kinds of things, and we’ve done it by being creative, by coming together, and by creating new things. So for me, I really want us to see this ending, this ending of the world, as an opportunity for us to build the new world.”
That’s why she chose to call the works and process “The Estuary Projects” — it’s meant to symbolize an ending and beginning at the same time.
“The other thing with an estuary is an estuary has its own ecosystem,” Hicks  said. “And so actually at the moment where an ending and beginning meet, where the river and ocean meet, there’s something brand new that’s created there. There’s like a brand new ecosystem. So I’m trying to signal us to think of this as an estuary moment.”
Another memorial in a different location
After the installation for Hargett, works for six other women will follow through May: 17-year-old Desiree Denise Etheridge, 22-year-old Darlene Rogers, 31-year-old Lois Hood Nesbitt, 19-year-old Valyric Holland, 30-year-old Sandra Boulware, and 34-year-old Bobbie Jean Graham. Artworks remembering Christine Ricketts, 15, Andrea Foye, 17, Gwendolyn Yvette Stinson, 15, and Caren Prater, 25, have already gone up and been taken down.
_________________________________________________________
While we can't bring the victims of the Boston 1979 murders back, we can memorialize their lives and help their surviving family members and their loved ones to survive as well as to help young Black women, men, and their children to avoid pitfalls and to beat the odds stacked against them in this increasingly racist, polarizing society. We can do this by mentoring, nurturing potential talent of our young Black girls and boys, etc.
Here's a pamphlet we need to read:
Also, visit Kendra Hicks' website:
The victims:
  • Christine (Chris) Ricketts, 15
  • Andrea Foye, 17 
  • Gwendolyn Yvette Stinson,15
  • Caren Prater, 25
  • Daryal Ann Hargett, 29
  • Desiree Denise Etheridge, 17
  • Darlene Rogers, 22
  • Lois Hood Nesbitt, 31
  • Valyric Holland, 19
  • Sandra Boulware, 30
  • Bobbie Jean Graham, 34

Do You Think It's Funny You're Gonna N-Tap Me?

European troll got a serving of American knuckle style chili!
Reminder to those reading Journal de la Reyna and our reader's lists. We are an apologetically, unabashed Black culture blog. We don't force anyone to read the content. Any views expressed by those contributing to this blog does not reflect on the general purpose.

We are tolerant of race, gender, sexuality, nationality, religion, social and economic standings. We do not tolerate anti-Black, conservative, nationalist and far-right extremism here on this blog.

I contribute to a portion of the postings we have here on the blog. I've been doing it for nearly 10 years and I see no reason not to.

We thank you for your reading and feedback.

Tariq Nasheed is a pro-Black activist. While I strongly disagree with the way he's going at Kamala Harris and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, I still support some of the themes of his commentary.


An American man and his Swiss wife were insulted by a man. He moved from Los Angeles to Switzerland be with his girlfriend and some white guy decided to call him a NIGGER to his face.

The Black man decided to serve him a hot plate of American style knuckle style chili.

"You want to walk by and talk shit?" the black man behind the camera asks the white man. "Get the fuck out of my face, get the fuck out of my face."

"Don't ever disrespect me, bro," he adds after what appears to be a physical confrontation.

White man decided to play the victim after he was called out by the Black man.

See they turn coward whenever they want to toss that racial slur in the faces of Black men and Black women.

In the last posting in regards to the murder of MacKenzie Lueck, some far-white troll decided to toss the NIGGER around. Thankfully he's not face-to-face with me. I would offer him a "40 acres and mule" moment.

I hate to say this, but conservatives are begging for a hospital visit talking that smack.

Stephanie Grisham Got A Korean Taco!

Trump's spox got a taste of North Korea.
Stephanie Grisham is the replacement for that bumbling troll Sarah Huckabee Sanders. The outgoing White Press Secretary is leaving Donald J. Trump. She is heading back to the private life and possible political ambitions.

Well Grisham is the current press secretary to the reclusive Melania Trump. The position will soon belong to someone else. Grisham will now be the new idiot at the podium.

Expect nothing to change when it comes to transparency.

Grisham was in the Republic of Korea with Trump when she decided to get her chance at meeting the dictator of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Kim Jong-Un.
White House press secretary got roughed up.
The North Korean security wasn't playing any games with Trump and his allies. They showed Grisham a Korean Taco. According to the Washington Post and several reporters on the scene, guards attempted to block entry to the press corps and Grisham tried to intervene.

Grisham got a nasty taste of NK.

Grisham, who has been the communications director for first lady Melania Trump for the past two years, was named last week to replace Sarah Huckabee Sanders as White House press secretary. Grisham will keep her current job too.

The incoming idiot got minor burn from that Korean Taco.

What Happened To Shaquille Dukes?

American man attached to medical equipment arrested by Illinois cops for allegedly stealing it.
An Illinois man was arrested after he was accused of stealing an IV. A security officer saw the man leave a Freeport hospital with an IV and he confronted him.

The video went viral on social media and has the nation talking.

BAD COPS WILL GET GOOD COPS KILLED.

GUN VIOLENCE IS THE NUMBER ONE THREAT IN THE UNITED STATES.

AGAIN, THAT RUSSIAN-BACKED BLUE LIVES MATTER CROWD WANTS TO JUSTIFY THIS DETAINMENT AS ANOTHER BLACK MAN OVERREACTING AND PLAYING THE "RACE CARD" TO HATE ON COPS. BLACK PEOPLE ARE NOT HATING ON COPS. WE JUST NOT GOING TO ALLOW OURSELVES BECOME THE NEXT HASHTAG WHEN WE DIE. 

I AM SICK OF HEARING THIS BULLSHIT.

CONSERVATIVES SAY THAT THERE ARE MORE BLACK CHILDREN LIVING IN SINGLE PARENT HOUSEHOLDS WITHOUT A FATHER.

IT'S FUNNY! WHEN THE POLICE SHOOT AN UNARMED MAN OF COLOR, THAT COULD HAVE BEEN THE CHILD'S FATHER.

WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING TO KEEP OUR CHILDREN AND WOMEN OF COLOR SAFE.

WE NEED TO PROTECT OURSELVES FROM THESE RACE SOLDIERS WHO BELIEVE THE BADGE IS THEIR WEAPON OF CHOICE.

Shaquille Dukes was walking outside FHN Memorial Hospital on June 9, wearing a hospital gown and was attached to an IV. According to Dukes, he was in the hospital being treated for pneumonia for two days. Dukes said the doctor cleared him to walk outside the hospital just as long as he didn't leave the property.

Dukes and two companions were making their way back to the building when a security guard called them to his car. The guard accused Dukes of stealing the equipment.





Dukes is Black said that he was racially profiled by the white security guards and police. He said that he filed a formal complaint with the city. Freeport city manager Lowell Crow said that he plans to review the videos on social media as well as police footage.
Shaquille Dukes had a seizure after he was placed in the police car.
The hospital did confirm that the security officer was employed for them. However, they said the matter will look at.

Dukes said that once he was arrested, the IV was removed from his arm and his rescue inhaler was seized.

Dukes then got a seizure.

"Eventually while I was being transported, I passed out and had a seizure. When I woke up in the back of the car, I had an asthma attack. I didn't get my inhaler until probably four minute later."

DMZ! As Simple As 1,2,3.....!


American president walks across the Korean Demilitarized Zone to meet North Korean supreme leader for a brief photo-op. The first sitting U.S. president to do so.

The Republican Party would have demonize Barack Obama if he would shake hands with Kim Jong-Un. Matter of fact, they have demonized Obama the very day he took office. They were critical of every fucking thing he's done.

They would label him a traitor. They would say he would bow to our world's enemies and he disrespects the men and women who died in the Korean War. They would say that he would have blood on his hands if he shook hands with a dictator.

However, Donald J. Trump is the current one. Republicans, conservatives and far-white agitators are singing nothing but praise for this.

The very same assholes are trolling social media saying that Trump shaking hands with Kim Jong-Un is worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize. No policy accomplishments. Just a lot of grandeur and cameras.

Given this is the guy who has called Americans "sons of a bitches" because they kneel to the national anthem. Given this the is guy who said that American police can rough up those bad folks. Given this is the guy who threatened the American media with hatred and vitriol.

Trump becomes the first American president to visit the DMZ and enter the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. He walked across the demarcation line into North Korea.

Trump continuously touts his potential third meeting with the dictator.

Trump and Kim meet in the lateral office known as the "Peace House."

"You are the first U.S. president to cross this line. This has a lot of significance because it means that we want to bring an end to the unpleasant past and try to create a new future, so it's very courageous and determined act," said Kim through his translator.

The 73 year old Trump meets the 35 year old Kim is a historical moment. I mean I am not going to lie but they will give this imbecile a page in the history books.

Otto Warmbier the American man who was imprisoned in a North Korean workhouse was beaten into a coma. He would die after he was released to the United States. Trump said that he would launch holy hell on North Korea. We were at the brink of a global war. But Kim called Trump to work out their differences. They tried this twice and it ended in failure. Maybe the third time is the charm.

I guess this "really good guy" is willing to meet with Trump at the White House.




Saturday, June 29, 2019

We Keep The Bugs Out!

As Kamala Harris rises in the polls, the far-white and trolls are trying to smear her.

Why does the far-white often comes to our blog to troll this bullshit?

I love to read this bullshit. They actually think calling us racial slurs are going to hurt our feelings. What I normally do is remove the comments and move on. This one deserves a response. Grab a magnifying glass and a highlight.

How many 'women of color' are killed by White men? Almost ZERO, fuckhead. Keep taking up for your pet niggers, shit for brains. They will be your downfall.

This is what white men do.

This was the most recent remarks left on our blog. This comes from the latest controversy surrounding a white woman who was murdered in Utah by a Black man.

MacKenzie Lueck was murdered by a Salt Lake City man who allegedly burned her body. Her death became the latest de jour of missing white women syndrome. I've said that if the suspect was Black, Muslim or an immigrant, expect the far-white, that imbecile and Fox News to exploit this.

The suspect is facing the DEATH card and will be charged in court. The suspect is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

In the posting, I made the remarks, where's the sympathy for all the people of color killed by white men.

This troll responded with this bullshit. I said the truth. Far-white extremists would often troll Black blogs and social media to throw inappropriate discussions about how white women should avoid relationships with people of color. They would use racial slurs, coded language and concern trolling as an excuse to justify their hatred.

Sigh.

Anyway, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) may see a bump in her polls. The California senator running for president did a really good job on Thursday. She landed a couple of blows on former vice president Joe Biden.

Now her rise in the polls are now attracting the attention of white extremists, black chauvinists like Tariq Nasheed, black separatists and coonservatives.


Many on the far-white are calling Harris not authentically Black. Her father is Jamaican and her mother is Indian. She is the first African American woman in California to be elected U.S. Senator.

She is married to a white man and is the step-mother of his two children.

Harris might have to build up a debunking team because that imbecile is willing to use Russian influence to win his reelection bid.

Progressives already see the writing on the wall. Russian bots and troll farms are actively trying to destroy Biden, Harris, Pete Buttigieg, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Beto O'Rourke.


Harris was then a former San Francisco County prosecutor turned state attorney general. She is facing the same bullshit Barack Obama faced when he ran for president. Obama's father is from Kenya and his mother was from the United States. He is biracial but is identified as African American. He is married to Michelle Robinson (now Obama) and has two daughters.
Tulsi Gabbard hasn't face the wrath of the far-white, yet. But if she does rise in the polls her citizenship will be questioned.
Fox News, Republicans and far-white agitators like The Drudge Report, The Gateway Pundit, Infowars and Breitbart have soiled racial angst into Obama's two terms.

I remember a former co-worker was belligerently calling Obama a "racist" because he doesn't acknowledge his white half. I kept telling her that he was there for his mother's and grandmother's death. She didn't believe it. Before there was the "fake news" chants, there was the denial of Obama's birthplace, race, and religion.

Donald J. Trump had sparked this nonsense during Obama run for president and reelection.

His son Donald Trump, Jr. also threw out the dog whistle.

Harris and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) are women of color. Gabbard was born in the U.S. territory of American Samoa. That territory has been controversial for the fact those living in the territory aren't U.S. citizens. They are called U.S. nationals and have to obtain a passport to enter the mainland. Samoans don't want to accept citizenship because it could void it's (conservative) traditionalist government.

Military veterans like Gabbard have to join in order to be relieved of U.S. national status. Gabbard's father was born in American Samoa and her mother is from Indiana. She is American under federal law regardless.

Obama, Harris, Gabbard, John McCain and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) faced birtherism.

Truth With A Twist: Tornadoes, Politics and Achieving Power




Delusions Of Grandeur!

East Atlanta's own Gucci Mane is slimmer. He's a best selling author, musician,fashion designer, producer and married man. Radric Delantic Davis pioneered the trap music along with many Atlanta rappers.

He has released mixtapes, studio albums, collaborative albums, extended plays and compilations.

His latest album was released last week and I didn't even know he released it.

Delusions of Grandeur is out and Gucci Mane released it under his label imprint 1017 GUWOP and Atlantic Records. This is the fourteenth album.

The album features guest appearances from Meek Mill, Gunna, Lil Baby, Justin Bieber, Jeremih, A Boogie wit da Hoodie, Wiz Khalifa, Rick Ross, Lil Uzi Vert, Young Dolph, Peewee Longway and Anuel AA.

During an appearance on Beats 1, Gucci Mane announced the title of his studio album.



The album has production from longtime collaborators Zaytoven and Southside Sizzle. The rapper also has production from Cubeatz, Hitmaka, J. White Did It, London on da Track, Murda Beatz,  OG Parker, Smash David, Kenny Beats, Tay Keith and Honorable C.N.O.T.E.

Friday, June 28, 2019

What Happened To MacKenzie Lueck?

American woman found dead after a week of media coverage. The suspect was a Black man. The far-white trolls are focusing directing on this.
Cue the racism.

Another missing white woman and the junk food media needs a villain. The villain is a Black man and of course, the far-white is trolling the racism yet again.

Missing white women syndrome is a coined term by African American journalists. They concluded that the junk food media is devoting numerous amounts of coverage to a white women who lives in a privileged life going missing. They believe that white women going missing is a ratings grab. Whenever the victim does turn up dead, Republican lawmakers often try to pass controversial crime bills and naming them after the deceased. If the suspect is white, they will give a sympathetic story.

If the suspect is Black, Muslim or immigrant, far-white extremists would often troll Black blogs and social media to throw inappropriate discussions about how white women should avoid relationships with people of color. They would use racial slurs, coded language and concern trolling as an excuse to justify their hatred.

How many women of color are killed by white men?

Do white men often troll social media with "thoughts and prayers" to women of color?

The suspect is a 31 year old man who Salt Lake City Police fingered as the suspect in the murder of Mackenzie Leuck.

The woman who attended the University of Utah was riding in a Lyft rideshare when she was dropped off around 3pm.
The law comes guns drawn to arrest the man who is charged in the murder of MacKenzie Lueck.
Phone records determined that this guy was the last person she talked to. Lueck's phone and purse were missing. But the law found in the backyard of the suspect was human tissue. It was located in a burn pit. The suspect may have raped and murdered Lueck and then burned her body.

The suspect faces aggravated kidnapping and desecration of a body. They are planning on charging this guy with murder.

Investigators conducted a 19-hour search of the suspect's home in the early hours on Thursday. They soon figured he was the "person of interest."

Salt Lake City Police chief Mike Brown revealed that the suspect's garden had traces of human DNA and it matched the missing woman.

Neighbors have observed odd behavior of this suspect. The suspect had burned stuff in his yard which was not normal to the neighbors.

Lueck's family in California were devastated. They had reported her missing on June 20 after she failed to acknowledge she made it home.

The suspect is a military veteran who is an information technology specialist. He was trying to be a model and wrote a book on how to kill a person.

Allegedly Lueck was revealed to be a woman who wanted to date "sugar daddies." She found interest in the sex trade.

"Try Tinder and be blunt about it. Mine's say 'I want a SD/SB (sugar daddy/sugar baby) relationship with a real connection.' If they don't know what a SD/SB is, tell them bluntly sugar daddy and sugar baby. But if they don't know, they aren't really worth your time."
Suspect wrote a book on how to get away with murder.
She said that wanted men who were over 35 and she wanted to seek arraignments.

I can only imagine that she and the suspect had sex and she tried to blackmail him. She probably stole stuff from him. Who knows what really happened before this suspect killed her.

All the junk food media wants you to know that she was a pretty white woman who was killed by a Black man.

Expect Donald J. Trump, Republicans, conservatives and far-right agitators to find some form of outrage and controversial legislation to roll out. The far-white will often say "cultural Marxism" as coded language for "NIGGER" or some racial angst.

The suspect is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The suspect could face LIFE or DEATH if convicted. Automatically he will get 20 years for kidnapping. The charges itself are going to have him facing a long time of bars.



Thursday, June 27, 2019

"Duh" Bait Part 2!

Day 2 of the Democratic debates.
NBC News, MSNBC, Telemundo, The Democratic National Committee, the Florida Democratic Party, YouTube and Facebook are hosting the second part of the first debate.

The second round of 10 candidates will join the stage in Miami.

Who will appear on stage in tonight's debate.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA)
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO)
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA)
Former Vice President Joe Biden
Mayor of South Bend, Indiana Pete Buttigieg
Author Marianne Williamson
Entrepreneur Andrew Yang
Former Colorado governor John Hickenlooper

Those who were excluded from the debate.

Governor Steve Bullock of Montana
Mayor of Miramar, Florida Wayne Messam
Rep. Seth Moulton (D-MA)
Former Sen. Mike Gravel (D-AK)
Former Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA)

Here's a poll for you.


Who won tonight's Democratic Presidential Debate? (Expect far-right trolls to pick the dumbest answers)

Bernie Sanders
Kamala Harris
Joe Biden
Eric Swalwell
Marianne Williamson
Kirsten Gillibrand
Michael Bennet
Andrew Yang
Pete Buttigieg
John Hickenlooper
None Of Them
Donald Trump
One Of The Candidates From Night One
One Of The Candidates Who Didn't Make The Debate

In this debate, who will win the night?

Florida is a very important state for Republicans. Donald J. Trump carried the state by five points.

Trump is in Japan for the G-20 Summit. He will be tweeting some insult or ridiculous version of trolling. He is allegedly meeting with Vladimir Putin again. He will do it privately with his interpreters and without any White House advisers. He could be meeting Kim Jong-Un again.


Mind you that America is really divided over issues. Trump has a three point advantage in Florida and has a 67% chance of winning reelection.

Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Mike Gravel are perennial candidates. This is Biden's third go, Sanders second go and Gravel's fourth go.

Democrats are undecided on who is the best candidate to win against Trump.

Biden, Warren and Sanders are up in the age. They are aged between 65 and 78 years old.

Trump is 73 years old.

We will see who can become the standout candidate.

SCOTUS Threw Census Question And Gerrymander Challenges Out!

The Court pisses off Trump, progressives and conservatives. The current justices are Steven Breyer, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts (Chief Justice), Ruth Bider Ginsburg, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Brett Kavannaugh.
The conservative John Roberts Supreme Court has gotten progressives, conservatives and Donald J. Trump upset. They made two decisions that impact the U.S. Census.

The U.S. Census will not have a citizenship question. The Court's 5-4 decision to keep the U.S. Census in tact. The Huffington Post reports that the Department of Justice and that incompetent leader are pissed.

Kelly Laco, a spokesperson for the Department of Justice, said, "We are disappointed by the Supreme Court's decision today. The Department of Justice will continue to defend this Administration's lawful exercises of executive power."

The court ordered the case back to a lower court for further review, which appeared to effectively block the question because the Census Bureau says the forms for the survey need to start being printed on July 1.

A census to count every living person in the United States is mandated by the Constitution to take place once every 10 years. The official date for the 2020 census is April 1, though people can begin to respond in the weeks before that day. Preparations for the census have been underway for years.

Civil rights groups sued the Trump administration over the citizenship question, arguing that it would discourage people of color from participating and effectively give more power to Republicans and non-Hispanic whites. By the Census Bureau’s own analysis, millions of people could be left out. Activists say that because census responses power redistricting, inaccurate information could lead to dramatic electoral consequences.

"If the citizenship question is part of the survey and there is a sizable undercount, states with large immigrant populations could very well lose political representation in Congress," according to the American Civil Liberties Union. "Depressing census response rates in already underrepresented communities will allow politicians to draw even more skewed legislative districts and further dilute the political power of these communities."

Activists cheered Thursday’s decision but cautioned that some damage may have already been done.

"We know that even the specter of the citizenship question has intensified this climate of fear. And even in the best of times without a citizenship question, the work to get to an accurate count is one of the most challenging operations in peacetime America," said Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. "After today's decision, which we all hail as a huge win for democracy in this country, we also know our work isn't over."
The worst are yet to come.
The states that had partisan gerrymandering will continue but the court said that it should be a state and voter matter instead of the Supreme Court. This allows state controlled partisans governance in how districts are drawn. So the state house can break down the Congressional boundaries to favor one party over the other.

In a 5-4 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that partisan gerrymandering was a political question beyond the reach of the federal court. There are no fair and manageable standards for judges to evaluate whether a gerrymander is constitutional, Roberts wrote in his majority opinion.

"We conclude that partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts," Roberts wrote in Thursday’s decision. "Federal judges have no license to reallocate political power between the two major political parties, with no plausible grant of authority in the Constitution, and no legal standards to limit and direct their decisions."

Roberts was joined by the court’s four other conservative justices in the majority.

The court's decision ensures state lawmakers will have virtually unlimited license to choose the voters who elect them. By packing the opposing party's voters into as few districts as possible or spreading them out among many districts, lawmakers can make it next to impossible for the other party to win a majority of legislative or congressional seats.

Justice Elena Kagan, in a dissenting opinion joined by the three other liberal-leaning justices, wrote about the corrosive effect gerrymandering has on American democracy. New technology, she said, would only make the practice more extreme.

"If left unchecked, gerrymanders like the ones here may irreparably damage our system of government," she wrote. "Of all times to abandon the Court’s duty to declare the law, this was not the one. The practices challenged in these cases imperil our system of government. Part of the Court's role in that system is to defend its foundations. None is more important than free and fair elections."

Kagan further added, "The majority's idea instead seems to be that if we have lived with partisan gerrymanders so long, we will survive."

Gubernatorial and state legislative elections later this year and in 2020 will now determine which party controls redistricting for the following decade. Republicans currently have the power to draw far more congressional districts than Democrats do (179 to 76); if that continues after the 2020 elections, the Supreme Court’s decision will effectively entrench GOP rule.

The cases the Supreme Court ruled on involved congressional districts in North Carolina and Maryland, two great examples of the power of gerrymandering. In North Carolina, Republicans have controlled nearly all of the state's 13 congressional seats since 2012, even though they’ve consistently won only about half of the statewide congressional vote. In Maryland, Democrats redrew one of the state's congressional districts in 2011, flipping it from a Republican one to a Democratic one. Roscoe Bartlett, who represented the district, won with over 60% of the votes in 2010. In 2012, with new district lines in place, he lost to a Democrat by more than 20 percentage points. Democrats have held a 7-to-1 edge in that’s state's congressional delegation ever since.

The Supreme Court's ruling in the suit, which is actually two consolidated cases ― Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek ― is a disappointment to gerrymandering reform activists, who argued that Maryland and North Carolina were clear-cut examples of egregious partisan gerrymandering and that the court had to act. Lawmakers in both cases had admitted they drew electoral boundaries with the specific intent of advantaging their own party.

In North Carolina, Republicans had to redraw the state’s congressional districts after a 2016 court ruling said their first attempt had unlawfully diluted the influence of black voters. When they set out to draw a new map later that year, Republicans required that it continue to give Republicans a 10-to-3 advantage and told the mapmaker they hired not to consider race. A top Republican in the legislature boasted that the reason lawmakers were passing a 10-to-3 map was because it was not possible to draw a map that was 11-to-2.

The plaintiffs in the North Carolina case ― Democratic voters in each of the state’s congressional districts, the state Democratic Party and civic groups ― argued that the districts in North Carolina clearly violated the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech and the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection of the law. They also said lawmakers were essentially guaranteeing election outcomes, violating provisions of Article I of the Constitution, which says the members of the House of Representatives shall be chosen by "the people" and allows lawmakers to only set the "time, manner and place" of elections.

The Maryland case involved a challenge to the state's 6th Congressional District. The plaintiffs, Republican voters, said that Democrats intentionally gerrymandered the district in 2011 to flip it from a Republican one to a Democratic one.

During oral arguments in March, the more conservative justices on the court did not seem eager to weigh in on partisan gerrymandering. The U.S. Constitution gives lawmakers the power to draw district lines, and the conservative justices seemed hesitant to embrace the idea that the court had a responsibility to step in and decide when gerrymandering is so egregious that it becomes unconstitutional. They also appeared skeptical that there was a way to figure out when gerrymandering was so severe that it was unconstitutional.

"There are no legal standards discernible in the Constitution for making such judgments, let alone limited and precise standards that are clear, manageable, and politically neutral," Roberts wrote. "Any judicial decision on what is 'fair' in this context would be an 'unmoored determination' of the sort characteristic of a political question beyond the competence of the federal courts."

Paul Clement, a prolific Supreme Court lawyer who served as solicitor general under George W. Bush, argued on behalf of North Carolina lawmakers. He warned the court against striking down the districts, saying it would invite a flood of lawsuits from people who were dissatisfied with the results of elections.

The gerrymandering reform advocates on the other side of the case were concerned that computer mapping, big data and other new technology would allow lawmakers to gerrymander more precisely than they ever had before.

Democrats are determined not to let Republicans have as much influence in redrawing electoral boundaries in 2021 as they did in 2011. Former Attorney General Eric Holder is leading a group, the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, focused on helping Democrats win key state races that will ensure they have a seat at the table during redistricting.

There is also a movement to rein in excessive partisan gerrymandering outside of the courts. Voters in Michigan, Colorado, Utah and Missouri approved ballot initiatives to either allow independent commissions to redistrict or to limit excessive political considerations.

The current members of the John Roberts court are noted. Roberts was appointed as Associate Justice to replace Sandra Day O'Connor. However the death of William Rehnquist quickly elevated his appointment to be Chief Justice. Roberts was appointed by George W. Bush.

Sonia Sotomayor - Obama
Elena Kagan - Obama
Brett Kavannaugh - Trump
Clarence Thomas - G.H. Bush
Stephen Breyer - Clinton
Ruth Bader Ginsberg - Clinton
Neil Gorsuch - Trump
Samuel Alito - G.W. Bush

The decisions of 5-4 are extremely controversial. Many believe the Supreme Court justices are too partisan and fail at impartiality. Another branch of government that the citizens hate.

Unlike Trump and Congress, the Roberts court has at least 43% favorability. Trump has a 41% favorability.

(Addison) Mitch McConnell is the most hate politician overall.

Ted Cruz, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Lindsey Graham, Matt Gaetz, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Susan Collins, Jim Jordan, Liz Cheney, Rashida Tlaib, Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Kevin McCarthy, Steve Scalise, Dick Durbin, Tom Cotton, Rand Paul and Marco Rubio are the most hated lawmakers in the country.

Timing is everything. Sanders and Harris are running for the Democratic nomination. Could they overcome the doubt.

Trump is unpopular but he is likely to win 2020. Democrats need to find a path to victory and it has to be a strategy that paints the status quo as the problem and not the policies.

McConnell signals that he will confirm Trump's Supreme Court nominees if one retires or dies.



Alabama Charges Gun Shooting Victim For The Loss Of Her Unborn Child!

American woman is facing a test of the controversial Alabama fetus law. She is being charged for the death of her fetus after she was shot in the stomach by another woman.
 Alabama's controversial unborn law has already caused a controversy. A woman who lost her fetus after she was shot because she started a fight with the shooter is being charged with the death.

The law indicts Marshae Jones for the death of her own fetus. They charged the shooter who was identified as Ebony Jemison for murder of an unborn fetus, aggregated assault with a deadly weapon and attempted murder.

According to the law, the incident happened in December.

Police were told that there was a shooting outside a Dollar General store in the Birmingham suburb of Pleasant Grove.

Witnesses said that Jones was driven to Fairfield after the shooting.
The controversial decision to charge the shooting victim with the death of her fetus is drawing national attention.
The law went to Fairfield and found Jones with a gunshot wound to the stomach. She was rushed to the hospital. She told the authorities she was five months pregnant. The fetus did not survive the shooting.

The law found out that the incident stemmed over a fight between two women and a man. The law decided to charge Jones and Jemison.

"The investigation showed that the only true victim in this was the unborn baby," said Pleasant Grove police Lt. Danny Reid.

Alabama is a fucked up state. I mean how can anyone charge the victim of gun violence?

The woman who shot Jones is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The charges could put the woman in the iron college for LIFE.

This woman is African American. The shooter is African American. The state is Alabama and the governor is Kay Ivey. The two senators are Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) and Sen. Doug Jones (D-AL). The U.S. Representatives for Alabama for Jefferson County which is Birmingham are Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL) and Rep. Terri Sewell (D-AL).

They better do something. Cause this is a disgrace.

Jones is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. She could face LIFE as well.

This is ridiculous for Americans gun shooting victims to be charged with the death of their own fetus.

Hopefully the Democrats will have this in the debate.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails