The Supreme Court Ain't S***!

Roger Taney was a terrible Chief Supreme Court Justice. John Roberts will join him in being one of the most terrible. Over 20 years and some the worst decisions in history.

Major rulings are coming and it will likely not be good for the United States.

Once again, white men are becoming more of threat to the structure of the nation.

President Donald J. Trump has proven that white men can not be leaders much longer. The Congress proves they can't govern on behalf of the public. The Supreme Court is not ruling like a body of justice but more like an activist with a podcast or talk show.

We are about mark 250 years of misinformation and deception. The United States was founded by white colonialists with a lack of education, improper hygiene and this notion that they must have shiny things. The founders looked upon the elites as inferior only to become those they loathed. Out of 45 men, one Black man was the U.S. president. They saw other people who were their likeness as cattle and toys for their pleasure. They molly wopped religious nonsense on the indigenous and Africans to keep them in fear of death.

They took our history and made it into their own. They refuse to pay for the labors that made this country exist.

They hijacked islands, expelled royals (the Kingdom of Hawa'ii), colonized communities and place their own branding of how governance to exist.

They literally fought one another over how they can keep people enslaved either as servants or pleasure to their misguided families.

Since 1948, all the U.S. presidents maintained a special relationship with a religious apartheid genocidal ethnostate. As we are moving closer to another world war, our current president isn't stepping off that boat yet.

He is afraid that country could ruin his legacy as a playboy real estate developer turned politician. He is afraid that the facade of his namesake will be tarnished for generations.

More and more Americans are looking at the -isms as distractions. Because your free speech should not impede on me feeding my family, paying my bills, providing my safety or the luxury to do anything. The -isms are inherited from your family members or some dumb ass agitator getting rich off the words spewed in the junk food media.

I do not condone hate. But if these assholes want to hate people because of their race, gender, religion, disabilities, mental fitness, body type, sexual orientation, gender identification, political votes, social standings, economic standings, immigration status or the feelings of others, let them cook in the filth.

They are repressed in their feelings. Even if they scream in your face, all you see is a red nose, makeup, a goofy wig, a big suit and big shoes. They are juggling around balls.

We can rid ourselves of one only to have thousands of others to reenact the very same shit.

They want to gas you up to commit crimes against one another. I am done worrying about someone using their free speech to disrespect me. They can say whatever the fuck they want.

They are going to bathroom dropping ducces like me and everyone else.

I support a country that works for the public in the common good. I believe everyone has the right to be themselves. 

I am supportive of Black culture. I support more Black own and employed businesses.

I support the rights of our gay, lesbian, transgender, non conforming and bisexual community.

I empathize with Palestinians, Haitians, Cubans, Iranians, Congolese, Sudanese and Somalis as they face decades of colonialist punishment because they stood on business to not exploit their resources for betterment of the capitalist.

I empathize with our indigenous communities in the United States and Canada.

I empathize with our Americans who have disabilities.

I support Black fatherhood and Black empowerment.

The Trump Administration won. They can now legally deport Haitians and Syrians who filed for temporary asylum.

I support Black women and date them. I have dated outside my race and will continue to do so. I hold no bias towards white women, Asian American women, transwomen, women with disabilities, women with body type and any woman of color. I would date anyone who like me for being me. For now, I rather stay single.

I am not anti anything. 

I am basically relying on survival as my tool for success now in this chaotic second term of Donald J. Trump.

Here's a question.

Why are we paying federal and state taxes to a government that don't give a fuck about you?

They want to take away your rights but still have you pay them to do so. Make it make sense.

Current Supreme Court.

Clarence Thomas - longest held. George H.W. Bush.

John Roberts - second longest, current Chief Justice. George W. Bush.

Samuel Alito - George W. Bush.

Sonya Sotomayor - Barack Obama.

Elena Kagan - Barack Obama.

Neil Gorsuch - Donald J. Trump.

Brett Kavanaugh - Donald J. Trump.

Amy Coney Barrett - Donald J. Trump.

Kentaji Brown Jackson - Joe Biden.

The Supreme Court cleared the way Thursday for the Trump administration to potentially revive an immigration policy once used to turn back migrants seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The justices, in a 6-3 decision, overturned a lower court order blocking the practice that limited the number of people who could apply for asylum each day under the Obama administration and during Trump’s first term.

Advocates said the tactic created a humanitarian crisis as thousands of people settled in unsafe makeshift shelters to await their turn. The Trump administration said it was necessary to deal with an increase of asylum seekers at the border.

The policy isn’t in place now, though authorities have imposed other restrictions on asylum seekers.

The administration argues that metering is a critical tool that’s been used by presidents of both parties and should stay available. Federal attorneys say people turned away at the border could come back later, though lines were thousands of people long when the policy was in place before.

The case is one of several immigration suits is considering this term, including Trump’s push to end restrict birthright citizenship and his administration’s effort to strip legal temporary protections for migrants fleeing instability and armed conflict.

Under federal law, migrants who arrive in the U.S. must be able to apply for asylum and be screened for fear of persecution in their home countries.

Louisiana and many southern states can now remove hair or religious symbols from inmates at their discretion.

The Justice Department argued that people stopped by authorities haven’t arrived, so immigration agents don’t have to let them apply.

But attorneys for people seeking asylum say the law has long meant anyone arriving at a port of entry should be screened, and blocking arrivals disregards the nation’s ideals.

Metering was first used during President Barack Obama’s administration when large numbers of Haitians appeared at the main crossing to San Diego from Tijuana, Mexico. It was expanded to all border crossings from Mexico during Trump’s first term in the White House.

Under federal law, migrants who arrive in the U.S. must be able to apply for asylum and be screened for fear of persecution in their home countries.

The Justice Department argued that people stopped by authorities haven’t arrived, so immigration agents don’t have to let them apply.

But attorneys for people seeking asylum say the law has long meant anyone arriving at a port of entry should be screened, and blocking arrivals disregards the nation’s ideals.

Metering was first used during President Barack Obama’s administration when large numbers of Haitians appeared at the main crossing to San Diego from Tijuana, Mexico. It was expanded to all border crossings from Mexico during Trump’s first term in the White House.

It ended in 2020 when the government introduced greater restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic, and President Joe Biden formally rescinded it in 2021.

The same year, a California-based federal judge found that metering violated the asylum seekers rights and the law requiring screening. A divided appeals court panel affirmed the ruling but nearly half of judges on the full San Francisco-based court voted to rehear it, a strong signal that might have caught the attention of the Supreme Court.

U.S. law allows people seeking refuge to apply for asylum once they are on American soil, regardless of whether they came legally. To qualify for asylum, they must show a fear of persecution in their homeland for specific reasons, like race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion.

People who are eventually granted asylum can’t be deported. They can legally work, bring in immediate family, apply for legal residency and seek citizenship.

Hawai'ians can carry firearms into private facilities. It now justifies folks who want a revolutionary movement to reclaim Hawai'i as sovereign kingdom.

The Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration Tuesday in an immigration case dealing with the government’s power over green card holders accused of crimes.

The 6-3 decision centers on an immigration officers’ 2012 decision to put lawful permanent resident Muk Choi Lau on immigration parole when he returned from a short trip to China because he had been accused of a counterfeiting crime.

Lau argued that the officer overstepped their authority, and the decision wrongly allowed the Department of Homeland Security under then-President Barack Obama an easier path to removal after he pleaded guilty to selling counterfeit clothes in New Jersey.

The high court disagreed. “Border officers did not have the burden to establish by clear and convincing evidence that Lau had committed a crime involving moral turpitude,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the opinion.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, writing that the decision to put Lau on immigration parole effectively sentenced him to “immigration limbo” before he’d been convicted of any crime.

“I worry that the Court has now handed the Government a massive blank check,” she wrote in the dissent joined by her two liberal colleagues.

The liberal group Alliance for Justice echoed that concern, saying the ruling could provide an expanded path for revoking green cards.

But Advancing American Freedom, a group founded by former Republican Vice President Mike Pence, called it an important case to allow the removal of people who “abuse the privilege of being granted lawful permanent resident status.”

The decision comes as the high court considers a series of immigration-related issues against the backdrop of President Donald Trump’s sweeping immigration crackdown, though this case started before Trump took office.

His administration argued that suspicion of a crime is enough to put a lawful permanent resident, also known as a green-card holder, on immigration parole. Federal attorneys urged the court to take an expansive view of executive authority over immigration.

The court is also considering cases over Trump’s push to end birthright citizenship, potentially revive a restrictive asylum policy and end temporary legal protections for migrants fleeing war and natural disasters in their homelands.

The court also gave the federal government the power to rescind temporary protection visas for Haitians and Syrians.

The court also ruled that Hawai'i cannot bar gun owners from private facilities for public use. So basically, a person can carry firearms into malls, schools, restaurants and religious facilities without being told to leave. 

The court also ruled that Louisiana was justified in cutting off dreads of a man who is a Rastafarian.

The justices condemned what happened to the former inmate, Damon Landor. But they ruled that a federal law designed to protect the religious rights of inmates does not permit lawsuits for money damages against individuals even when rights are violated.

The high court, in a 6-3 decision, agreed with lower courts that without exception had ruled that the law, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, can’t be used to hold those who violate inmates’ rights financially responsible.

Soon.

Folks are going to look at the Supreme Court as fucking joke. They are going see the court members feel the heat. Just you wait. You don't see the out in public much because they are protected by the U.S. Marshals. But folks are seeing that the decisions are not going to sit well.

You keep poking the hive and bees come out and sting.

Again, I am not endorsing violence. I have a strong feeling that the status quo will tear this nation apart. Again 1 out of 20 Americans believe violence is the only way to stop problems. That is a problem.