![]() |
| Can you add another one to the hot place? |
I expect former presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden to offer words to the family of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), the former Republican leader in the Senate.
![]() |
| Can you add another one to the hot place? |
😳 Rep. Lauren Boebert torches Rep. Tom Kean for his 4-month absence due to depression.
— TMZ (@TMZ) June 30, 2026
🎥: @jacob_wass pic.twitter.com/BmwE5Vy4SR
![]() |
| Boebert doesn't buy Kean's excuses. |
![]() |
| This ghoul will retire but likely in September. |
“Editor's note: Earlier today, we erroneously published a story saying that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was retiring,” NPR put out in a statement on it's website. “Neither Alito nor the court's public information office has announced his retirement, and we have retracted the story.”
There was speculation that the white nationalist on the Supreme Court was going to retire shortly after this inept Roberts Court concludes its session.
The news is definitely on the record.
President Donald J. Trump pressured Anthony Kennedy to retire in 2019 to get Brett Kavanaugh in. When Ruth Bader Ginsberg died in 2020, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) quickly pushed for Amy Coney Barrett to get confirmed despite pledging to not confirm nominees in a presidential election.
Republicans are secretly plotting for a boast to their fragile majority.
Trump has a job approval of 31% and Vice President JD Vance has a job approval of 33%.
Republicans have a job approval of 24% and the Democrats have a job approval of 25%.
Congress overall has a job approval of 21%.
The Supreme Court has a job approval of 25%.
Basically, we are in civil war numbers. All forms of governance is negative. None of these entities are improving the lives of the working class.
Alito is 76 and Clarence Thomas is 77.
Thomas, the second Black man to sit on the Supreme Court is the longest serving justice.
He was appointed by the late George H.W. Bush.
Trump could get up to get two or three Surpreme Court nominees this second term.
![]() |
| They warned her and she didn't listen. Well Melat Kiros came in and swept Diana DeGette out. |
![]() |
| When DeGette debated she kept not answering the questions. |
![]() |
| Democrats might want to join Hasan Piker's Twitch streams. It worked for Melat Kiros. |
![]() |
| Curmudgeon Trump will pick a replacement for Samuel Alito. |
As the Roberts Court concludes its session of fucked up decisions, Justice Samuel Alito retires. President Donald J. Trump gets a fourth Supreme Court Justice pick. This will certainly rile the Democrats.
Alito appointed during George W. Bush's second term served as the most conservative since the late Antonin Scalia and longest serving Clarence Thomas joined the court.
It is likely the Senate will call to session in September or October for the nominee.
They want to bring the base out to vote to protect the status quo.
The Republicans have a 53 seat majority and Sen. John Fetterman (I-PA) is likely going to back the nominee.
The senate must have a simple majority to confirm a nominee. They can lose Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) but end up getting Fetterman and Vice President JD Vance push it through.
President Donald J. Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Sen. John Thune (R-SD), Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Chief Justice John Roberts were notified.
Alito was nominated to the court in 2005 by President George W. Bush to fill the seat vacated by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.
In the history of the Supreme Court, the names of just a few justices are linked with a single very famous, or infamous, decision. Chief Justice John Marshall for his groundbreaking decision in1803, declaring that courts have the power to strike down laws that violate the Constitution. Chief Justice Roger Taney for his infamous decision in the Dred Scott case declaring that no African American, enslaved or free, could be a citizen of the United states, a decision that led in part to the Civil War; Chief Justice Earl Warren for his 1954 decision declaring racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional. And in our own times, Alito's name is indelibly linked with the court's opinion overturning a half century's worth of decisions declaring that women have a right to abortion.
A consequential conservative
Alito, unlike Marshall, Taney and Warren, was not chief justice, and he may even now be little known to the public generally. But throughout his tenure, he played a key role on the court, often leading the conservative charge, not just on abortion, but for expanded religious rights, against LGBTQ+ rights, against expanded voting rights, for the death penalty, against labor unions, and more.
His arrival at the court in 2006 to replace the more centrist Justice O'Connor, marked a decided shift to the right on the court. On contraception, for instance, he wrote the court's 5-to-4 decision declaring that closely held, for-profit corporations could refuse, on religious grounds, to comply with a federal law that requires employer insurance policies to cover contraception for their employees.
"This court has said time and again that we have no business judging whether any sincere religious belief is valid or reasonable and it would be dangerous if we started down that road," he said in his opinion.
On gun control, he wrote the court's 2010 decision striking down state bans on handguns in the home.
In death penalty cases, Alito was impatient with attempts to limit capital punishment. In voting rights cases, he repeatedly sided with state laws that make it more difficult for people to vote.
As he wrote in a 2021 opinion, "Mere inconvenience cannot be enough to demonstrate a violation" of the voting rights act.
Views on the culture wars
Few issues appeared to rankle Alito as much as those that directly or indirectly involved religion, and perhaps not incidentally, the modern culture wars.
As he put it in a 2022 speech in Rome: "There's also growing hostility to religion or at least the traditional religious beliefs that are contrary to the new moral code."
Yale law professor Akhil Amar says that for the conservatives on the court, Alito time and again was a workhorse, not a show horse.
"He's not flashy or flamboyant. But by not overreaching he's able to succeed," Amar said.
Alito's opinion for the 5-to-4 court majority in the abortion case was, in essence, his magnum opus on abortion and constitutional interpretation. He likely had been writing it in his head for years. There was no announcement of the opinion from the bench because the court stopped those public statements during the pandemic. But as Alito explained in his written opinion, the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe decision and the decades of decisions that followed had to be overruled because Roe was "egregiously wrong," the arguments for it "exceptionally weak," and because there was "no history or tradition of abortion at the time of the founding or thereafter."
Adam Congioli, an early Alito law clerk who became a close Alito friend, describes the justice as a man very comfortable with the law as a system of rules, rules that Alito believed were broken to create a right to abortion.
So, according to Congioli, as the justice saw things, "we should never have been in this business in the first place. This is not our job under the rules so I'm going to get us out of this business and I'm going to send it back to the legislatures for people to fight about."
"The right to keep and bear arms is implicit in our understanding of ordered liberty and deeply rooted in the traditions of our country," he wrote in his decision.
Others see Alito's abortion opinion differently.
Sarah Isgur, who served in the Trump Justice Department and is now the host of a podcast for the Dispatch, a conservative news outlet, said she saw Alito's abortion opinion as failing the critical test of persuasion.
The question, she said, should not have been whether Roe was correctly decided. "The question is: 'Do you overturn a precedent that has been on the books for 50 years. The most famous case probably to most Americans in the country?' And it's not even close."
Michael Dorf, a constitutional law professor at Cornell University, is more pointed, calling the Alito opinion "dishonest" because it so selectively cited history to make a one-sided case.
"One wonders how so many prior justices, a majority of whom were appointed by Republican presidents, could have found a right to abortion in the Constitution and then reaffirmed that right. There's a kind of arrogance to the opinion in the way it proceeds in a one-sided manner."
A legacy-defining opinion
Alito's friend Ciongoli acknowledges that the justice will be both praised and reviled for his abortion decision. That single opinion will be his legacy.
"Sam will undoubtedly be remembered for Dobbs. Period," he said. "I don't think he thought that out."
Indeed, in the immediate aftermath of the decision, Alito, who had long fought to reverse Roe, seemed more and more angry, even concluding at one point that the unprecedented leak of the draft opinion made the justices who voted to overturn Roe "targets for assassination," Ciolgoil said. "There were people who were going to try to kill them to try to change the outcome of the case."
"That sentence was aimed at his colleagues [on the court] who refused to issue a dissent in order to get the opinion out," he said.
In other words, Alito, and perhaps others in the majority, thought that after the leak of the abortion opinion, it was important to get the decision released quickly, thus preventing any deranged person from thinking he could change the outcome by killing one of the justices in the majority. But as Alito saw things, the three dissenters refused to be rushed, so that it was almost two months later that the decision was released to the public, a delay that clearly infuriated him.
Amar, the Yale professor, however, sees all this as mere atmospherics.
"For better and worse it is one of the most important and most recognized and consequential [decision] for the lives of all Americans and their deepest beliefs in all of American history," he said. "He took sown Roe versus Wade. So that's how he he will be forever remembered."
![]() |
| The Roberts Court of fools. |
When the U.S. Supreme Court rules against the people, more people will revolt against the system.
It may time for the U.S. move past the Supreme Court and maneuver a place in the International Court of Justice. The United States Supreme Court is totally out of touch with a growing demographic that isn't white or male.
The decision that rolled out on Monday and today's have finally came. The public will react to them in some fashion.
The Associated Press, HuffPost and Politico contributed to the blog post.
Okay, the ruling on transgender women. The court ruled that states can officially ban transgender Americans from playing sports if they were biologically born male or female.
I hope that transgender Americans stop paying their taxes or defy state bans and do it anyway. Cause you aren't going to be a genital inspector in a locker room.
The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that Title IX, the federal gender equity law, allows bans on trans girls’ and women’s participation in female school sports to stand.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the 6-3 decision, which combined two cases, West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox. He was joined by Justices John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett.
“The question before the Court is: Under Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, may schools maintain women’s and girls’ sports for biological females? In other words, may schools determine eligibility for women’s and girls’ sports based on biological sex? The answer is yes,” Kavanaugh wrote.
The more liberal justices concurred in part and dissented in part.
The Hecox case arose in 2020 when Idaho became the first state in the nation to pass a ban on trans girls’ and women’s participation in women’s athletics. That year, Lindsay Hecox, a trans woman who was then a first-year student at Boise State University, challenged Idaho’s law, claiming it violated her rights to equal protection under the 14th Amendment.
Hecox won both her cases in the district court and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, before the Supreme Court granted Idaho’s petition to hear the case in July of last year. Hecox has since asked the court to consider her case moot because she no longer plays or intends to play any sports. She said in her brief to the Supreme Court that she feared for her safety and ability to graduate as the subject of a high-profile case.
The other case, West Virginia v. B.P.J., examined a similar law and alleged that West Virginia’s ban also infringes on the gender equity law Title IX.
In both cases, the lawyers for the plaintiffs expressed fairly modest claims. They argued that only trans women and girls who have undergone hormone therapy should be allowed to play on women’s teams. Both Hecox and Becky Pepper-Jackson, the plaintiff in the other case, have done so.
The conservative Christian legal group representing both Idaho and West Virginia, the Alliance Defending Freedom, tried to make the case to the court for broader restrictions on trans rights by arguing that transgender identity is not the same as sex, and therefore should not be covered by equal protection statutes that prohibit sex discrimination.
LGBTQ+ advocates say anti-trans sports bans not only impact trans athletes but also open the door to invasive sex verification that can target anyone. Idaho’s law allows anyone to raise a claim disputing a student-athlete’s sex, which would require the student to see a doctor to verify their sex based on their reproductive organs, testosterone levels or genetics.
So far, 27 states have passed bans on trans athletes’ participating in women’s sports.
The Supreme Court struck down limits on coordinated spending between candidates and political parties on Tuesday, a win for Republicans that will fundamentally change how tens of millions of dollars are spent in congressional elections.
![]() |
| These are the same fools who are paying more in groceries. They have to have a scapegoat. Blame transgender Americans for their shitty lives. |
The Supreme Court rejects President Donald J. Trump's executive order to strip birthright citizenship. It is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and requires a constitutional amendment to change that.
A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens.
The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen.
“Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land,’” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment, “We keep that promise today.”
Three conservative justices would have allowed the restrictions to take effect.
The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the U.S.
During arguments in April, both conservative and liberal justices questioned the order’s legality in a momentous case that was magnified by Trump’s unprecedented attendance in the courtroom.
The case framed another test of Trump’s assertions of executive power that defy long-standing precedent for a court with a conservative majority and a robust view of presidential power that has largely ruled in his favor. In the notable exceptions when the court has not, Trump has responded with starkly personal criticisms of the justices.
The justices ruled on Trump’s appeal of a lower-court ruling from New Hampshire that struck down the citizenship restrictions.
The birthright citizenship order, which Trump signed on the first day of his second term, is part of his administration’s broad immigration crackdown.
![]() |
| The Supreme Court sucks. They all suck. |
Trump reacted furiously to the late February tariffs decision, saying he was ashamed of the justices who ruled against him and calling them unpatriotic.
He also seemed to recognize the court was likely to rule against him on birthright citizenship, too, using his Truth Social platform to criticize “dumb judges and justices” and wealthy pregnant women from China and elsewhere who come to the U.S. to give birth so their newborns will have American citizenship.
Trump’s order would have upended widely held views that the 14th Amendment confers citizenship on everyone born in the U.S., excluding only the children of foreign diplomats and those born to a foreign occupying force.
The amendment was intended to ensure that Black people, including former slaves, had citizenship, though the Citizenship Clause is written more broadly. “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside,” it reads.
In a series of decisions, lower courts have struck down Trump’s executive order as illegal. The decisions have invoked the high court’s 1898 ruling in Wong Kim Ark, which held that the U.S.-born child of Chinese nationals was a citizen.
The Trump administration argued that the common view of citizenship is wrong, asserting that children of noncitizens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore are not entitled to citizenship.
More than one-quarter of a million babies born in the U.S. each year would have been affected by the executive order, according to research by the Migration Policy Institute and Pennsylvania State University’s Population Research Institute.
While Trump has largely focused on illegal immigration in his rhetoric and actions, the birthright citizenship restrictions also would have applied to people who are legally in the United States, including students and applicants for green cards, or permanent resident status.
![]() |
| Bobbie Hirsch, a transmale fencer. He will now be banned from participating in athletes in states that bans transgender Americans from playing sports. |
![]() |
| The Trump Administration won. They can now legally deport Haitians and Syrians who filed for temporary asylum. |
I support Black women and date them. I have dated outside my race and will continue to do so. I hold no bias towards white women, Asian American women, transwomen, women with disabilities, women with body type and any woman of color. I would date anyone who like me for being me. For now, I rather stay single.
![]() |
| They fed their chunky butt to death. |
![]() |
| The boy was bedridden and nonverbal. The parents refused to have him get medical care. |
![]() |
| Busta Rhymes supposedly joining 50 Cent at a private event for MAGA. |
Donald Trump, Jr. is hosting a slew of old gees at his exclusive club in Washington, DC.
Apparently, Busta Rhymes, Timbaland, 50 Cent and Ja Rule are performers.
Timbaland is a producer and deejay who produced hits for the three. 50 and Ja have a long standing feud that blew up again in early 2026 when Tony Yayo and Uncle Murda accosted Ja on a flight. 50 went back on his bullshit. He has also targeted Rick Ross ans Clifford "T.I." Harris in his latest antics.
Ironic, Ja and 50 performing for MAGA despite the feud.
Didn't know DJ Timmy Tim, Ja and Busta Bust rocking with that shit. Well I knew 50 and Rozay rolling deep in the shit.
Hell, Nicki Minaj, Chilli, Waka Flocka Flame, Teddy Riley, Sheff G, Chief Keef, Takeshi 6ix9ine, Lil Pump, Lil Wayne, Ye and Sexyy Red rolling in this shit too.
Other rappers on that shit too.
Disconnect with the fans. Disconnect with the society we're all living in.
Tell you what we got to do as voters. Stop believing that endorsements and celebrities support of politicians matter. It doesn't.
They are entitled to support or oppose whomever they please.
It is not my place to stop an entertainer from voting or endorsing candidates.
Trump has a job approval of 31%. That means of 80 million people of voting age still rock with the policies of the president. So thus, of 335 million, only 1/3 will ride or die with this curmudgeon. It doesn't make much sense but hey, I am just a nobody with a blog.
50 Cent will perform at Donald Trump Jr.'s members-only MAGA club on the eve of America's 250th anniversary, the Daily Beast has learned.
The Grammy Award-winning rapper will take the stage at Executive Branch, the swanky Georgetown club co-owned by the president's eldest son, on July 3, sources told the Daily Beast.
Trump Jr. opened the club, which charges an annual membership fee of $500,000, alongside financiers Omeed Malik and Christopher Buskirk of 1789 Capital.
A person with ties to the Executive Branch told the Daily Beast that 50 Cent's performance follows several other rappers' headlining the club, including Busta Rhymes, Ja Rule, and Timbaland.
The scheduled performance comes after 50 Cent made headlines in 2024 for revealing on The Breakfast Club that he turned down $3 million to perform at Trump's rally at Madison Square Garden in New York.
"I'm afraid about politics," he said in October 2024. "It's because when you do get involved in it, no matter how you feel, someone passionately disagrees with you."
![]() |
| Ja Rule and Timbaland pose with Swizz Beatz. Ja and Tim are alleged performers at Donald Trump, Jr.'s MAGA club. |
"That's the formula for the confusion that sent Kanye to Japan," he said on The Breakfast Club. "He said something about [politics], and now he can only go to Japan."
While 50 Cent has not commented publicly on Trump's politics, his appearance at the Executive Branch appears to signal a change of heart on his part. The club has become a gathering place for well-connected figures within and around the Trump administration. Members reportedly include White House artificial intelligence adviser David Sacks, crypto investors Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and State Department Under Secretary Jacob Helberg. Former Rep. Mike Gallagher is also said to frequent the club as a guest.
It has also served as a post-dinner destination following major White House events. In November, it hosted an afterparty following a visit by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The crown prince, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, Federal Trade Commission Chair Andrew Ferguson, Sens. Ashley Moody of Florida and Dave McCormick of Pennsylvania, and Mehmet Oz were among those in attendance.
Donald Trump Jr. and his wife, Bettina Trump, were also reportedly there, along with numerous other political figures and Fox News hosts Bret Baier and Laura Ingraham.
![]() |
| Donald Trump, Jr. and wife Bettina. The controversial eldest son of President Donald J. Trump is making millions yet again off his father's shady deals with foreign leaders. |
For his part, 50 Cent has a history of shifting his stance on Trump, 80. In 2019, the rapper told The Daily Beast that Trump had offered him half a million dollars to attend his inauguration but that he turned it down because "every dollar is not a good dollar." The following year, he voiced support for Trump before later tweeting, "F**k Trump, I never liked him," reversing course amid backlash.
The Daily Beast has contacted 50 Cent's management for comment on his upcoming performance.
While Trump Jr.'s exclusive club has landed a major headliner, the same cannot be said for the president's "Great American State Fair."
On Friday, Vanilla Ice's Freedom 250 performance was abruptly canceled due to the weather.
That cancellation was one in a series of setbacks for Freedom 250, the organization spearheading celebrations for America's 250th birthday. Vanilla Ice was originally slated to perform alongside Young MC, Milli Vanilli, and C+C Music Factory. But one by one, the performers dropped off the bill.
Trump, Jr. married Bettina Anderson in May. The president had to skip the event due to constraints with the U.S. Secret Service and the government of the Bahamas having issues to provide safety. They wed in the Bahamas.
Trump, Jr. was engaged to former Fox agitator turned U.S. Ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfoyle. He cheated on her numerous times with other women. Guilfoyle was married twice. Once to California governor Gavin Newsom when he was San Francisco district attorney and Eric Villency whom she has a son with.
Trump, Jr. was previously married to Vanessa Trump. They have five children. Vanessa is dating Tiger Woods.
![]() |
| Turns 61 in July. Still on this YN shit despite being an old gee. |
![]() |
| He was crying. |
![]() |
| Ms. Ruth Lewis, you might to think about your association with Raymond Scott. He done got your ass in the county lockup. |
Benzino dropped a 50 Cent diss…
— DatPiff (@DatPiff) March 25, 2026
What yall think? pic.twitter.com/m1sAXyoDGi
Scott is the father of Coi LeRay, a major rapper, singer, model, media personality and podcaster.
Scott was the former co owner of The Source Magazine and Hip-Hop Weekly.
He had a brief stints on Love and Hip-Hop, Iyana: Fix My Life and Marriage Boot Camp.
He only released three albums as a solo artist. His albums The Benzino Project (also repackaged as The Benzino Remix Project), Redemption and The Archnemsis are no longer in distribution. You have to obtain them through eBay or Amazon.
At 60 years old, one would think Scott would just settle down from the microphone, camera and television. Not seeing he is no longer a rapper, Scott continues to act like he is one of these YN's.
![]() |
| Retire the noise, Raymond Scott. |
He ain't palling around them white guys. See Dave Mays and Jonathan Scheter were the brains and co-founders of The Source. Two white..... Jewish guys who went to Harvard and were listening to hip-hop on a local college station. They came together with James Benard and Ed Young.
![]() |
| Nobody wants to hear their grandfather rap. |
It is part of an ongoing feud that has been going on for over 20 years. It is the only thing memorable about him. Besides the reality series, "Love & Hip-Hop: Atlanta", Scott was the former co-owner of The Source Magazine and Hip-Hop Weekly.
SAMHSA’s National Helpline: 1-800-662-HELP (4357)
SAMHSA’s National Helpline is a free, confidential, 24/7, 365-day-a-year treatment referral and information service (in English and Spanish) for individuals and families facing mental and/or substance use disorders.
