SCOTUS Strikes Down Roe v. Wade!

The Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade.

The culture wars in American politics. White nationalism has once again prevailed. The healthcare of women, the responsibilities of doctors and the ignorance of American jurists. The country is completely divided. Soon it will be affirmative action, gay marriage, human rights, environmental protections and presidential powers. They will be on the line with the Supreme Court.

The leaked decision was the confirmation.

The Supreme Court has struck down Roe v. Wade.

Now the Justices will face death threats and there's a possibility of violent attacks sparked by this. The Department of Homeland Security is likely going to have a high alert for possible domestic terrorism.

All part of these ridiculous culture wars now will come to head. The Court made a fucking 6-3 decision.

Idiot Karen Barrett - Washed Up 45

Karen Thomas - George H.W. Bush

Karen Alito - George W. Bush

Karen Kavanaugh - Washed Up 45

Karen Gorsuch - Washed Up 45

Chief Justice Karen Roberts - George W. Bush

Stephen Breyer - Bill Clinton

Sonia Sotomayor - Barack Obama

Elena Kagan - Barack Obama

Ketanji Brown Jackson, designated Associate Justice - Joe Biden

Repercussions are coming

The U.S. Marshals in full force are protecting these justices. The Congress is considering legislation that provides protection and penalties for threats against the justices. Congress can't protect the children who were slain in a school and Black shoppers who were massacred by a white extremist.

The Karens of the Court decided that 49 years of right to privacy, medical decisions and safety are now the state's problem. It is not a popular decision by far.

President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, Congress and the state and territorial governors will react to the decision.

The Court released its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization on Friday, voting to overturn Roe v. Wade — the 1973 ruling that guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights. This most recent case, which was heard by the Court in December 2021, centered on a Mississippi law banning abortion if the "probable gestational age of the unborn human" is more than 15 weeks. This ruling comes after a draft decision document that signaled this outcome leaked on May 2.

The court’s controversial but expected ruling gives individual states the power to set their own abortion laws without concern of running afoul of Roe, which had permitted abortions during the first two trimesters of pregnancy.

Almost half the states are expected to outlaw or severely restrict abortion as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision, which is related to a highly restrictive new Mississippi abortion law.

Other states plan to maintain more liberal rules governing the termination of pregnancies.

Supporters of abortion rights immediately condemned the ruling, abortion opponents praised a decision they had long hoped for.

The court’s three liberal justices filed a dissenting opinion to the ruling, which quickly drew protestors to the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” Alito wrote.

“The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely — the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,” Alito wrote.

“That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be ‘deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition’ and ’implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.”

“It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives,” Alito wrote.

In their scathing joint dissent, the court’s liberal justices wrote, “The majority has overruled Roe and Casey for one and only one reason: because it has always despised them, and now it has the votes to discard them. The majority thereby substitutes a rule by judges for the rule of law.”

Roe v. Wade is gone and now the aftermath comes.

“The majority would allow States to ban abortion from conception onward because it does not think forced childbirth at all implicates a woman’s rights to equality and freedom,” said the dissent by Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

“Today’s Court, that is, does not think there is anything of constitutional significance attached to a woman’s control of her body and the path of her life,” it said. “A State can force her to bring a pregnancy to term, even at the steepest personal and familial costs.”

The decision came a day after the Supreme Court in another controversial ruling invalidated a century-old New York law that had made it very difficult for people to obtain a license to carry a gun outside of their homes.

VOTE.

VOTE TO GET REPUBLICANS OUT OF STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS.

IF YOU CONTINUE TO ALLOW REPUBLICANS TO LEGISLATE, THE COUNTRY WILL MOVE TOWARDS FACSISM AND AUTHORITARIANISM. 

Women are now 3/5 of a person when it comes to their bodies. They will regret this.

The case that triggered Roe’s demise, known as Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, is related to a Mississippi law that banned nearly all abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Dobbs was by far the most significant and controversial dispute of the court’s term.

It also posed the most serious threat to abortion rights since Planned Parenthood v. Casey, in which the Supreme Court reaffirmed Roe.

Dobbs deepened partisan divisions in a period of already intense political tribalism.

The early May leak of a draft of the majority opinion, which completely overturned Roe, sent shockwaves across the country and galvanized activists on both sides of the debate. It also cast a pall over the nation’s highest court, which immediately opened an investigation to find the source of the leak.

The publication of the court’s draft opinion, written by Alito, sparked protests from abortion-rights supporters, who were outraged and fearful about how the decision will impact both patients and providers as 22 states gear up to restrict abortions or ban them outright.

The leaked opinion marked a major victory for conservatives and anti-abortion advocates who had worked for decades to undermine Roe and Casey, which the majority of Americans support keeping in place.

But Republican lawmakers in Washington, who are hoping to win big in the November midterm elections, initially focused more on the leak itself than on what it revealed. They also decried the protests that formed outside the homes of some conservative justices, accusing activists of trying to intimidate the court.

The unprecedented leak of Alito’s draft opinion blew a hole in the cloak of secrecy normally shrouding the court’s internal affairs. It drew harsh scrutiny from the court’s critics, many of whom were already concerned about the politicization of the country’s most powerful deliberative body, where justices are appointed for life.

Roberts vowed that the work of the court “will not be affected in any way” by the leak, which he described as a “betrayal” intended to “undermine the integrity of our operations.”

The leak had clearly had an impact, however. Tall fencing was set up around the court building afterward, and Attorney General Merrick Garland directed the U.S. Marshals Service to “help ensure the Justices’ safety.”