Pages

Saturday, January 25, 2020

Tulsi Gabbard Sues Hillary Clinton!

Last place Tulsi Gabbard got Hillary Clinton living rent free in her head.
She is still running for president. But the junk food media has already moved on past her and is focusing on the candidates who are still viable.

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) decided to sue former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in a desperate bid to gain attention. It's kind of funny that a presidential candidate is willing to be laughed out of court because she's upset private person decided to have an opinion.

Clinton at one point held her remarks back about the candidates. Now as a private person, she remarks on how Donald J. Trump could win reelection. Recently, she slammed Gabbard and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) for being divisive figures in the Democratic primary. She said they have little accomplishments and are willing to destroy allies in order to win.

Gabbard is suing Clinton for $100 million.

"I will not stand quietly by as Hillary Clinton or anyone else tries to smear my character and my loyalty and dedication to serving our country. And I've filed a lawsuit against her for defamation to hold her accountable," said Gabbard.

This is the latest round of remarks that Gabbard made against Clinton.
Should Hillary Clinton sue Gabbard for calling her the "Queen of Warmongers?"
Gabbard's lawsuit argues that the congresswoman has proven her loyalty to America through her military service in the Army National Guard, charges Clinton with hurting her presidential bid.

Gabbard believes Clinton made remarks in retaliation to her endorsement of Bernie Sander in the 2016 Democratic primaries.

"In February 2016, Tulsi believes the best Democratic presidential candidate for our country was Senator Bernie Sanders. She also knew that Clinton had a stranglehold over the Democratic Party and that crossing Clinton (who considered herself the "inevitable nominee") could means the end of her own political career. Yet Tulsi put the country before herself, and she publicly endorsed Senator Sanders, becoming the the most prominent politician to do so at the time."

Clinton didn't mention Gabbrard by name but said that Republicans and the Russians got an eye on who they want as their "spoiler."

"I'm not making any predictions, but I think they've got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate," Clinton said. "She's the favorite of the Russians."

Who could blame Clinton?

Gabbard appeared on Breitbart and Fox News to speak out against her fellow contenders.

She will not run for reelection in her congressional district giving the notion that she's plotting a third-party bid.

She speaking talking points that are similar to the Kremlin.

And who could not forget Gabbard's vote for impeachment. She voted present.

Gabbard's ridiculous lawsuit will not get traction.

Gabbard is a public figure. To win a defamation suit, she would have to, first, prove that Clinton's comment referred to her, then prove that Clinton's statement was both false and malicious: that Clinton knew it to be false, or else recklessly disregarded its falsity. The case seems unlikely to survive half a minute in legal proceedings.

Democrats have openly complained about her and Sanders. They believe their supporters are causing disruption to the party. Some of the supporters on social media could be trolls online from the GRU.



No comments:

Post a Comment