NRA Goes After Obama And Gun Totting Senator!

With friends like this Senator Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia), who needs enemies? The president can't get things done because of idiots in his own party. Manchin is one of them. He comes from the state he never could win.

Quick question: If there's no source of food or human life on this planet, would you eat a firearm if there's no food?

Of course not. You've rather put it to the temple of your head if there's no one around and you're the last person on this planet.

Quick question: Why is it that Black men are depicted as natural born killers in the junk food media?

Simple. Black men are glorified by negative stereotypes of Blacks being criminals, thugs, pimps, rappers, and everything else they've watched in the junk food media. It is considered an ethnic subgenre of the general category of exploitation films. Hence the term, Blaxploitation. Blaxploitation films were originally made specifically for an urban black audience, although the genre's audience appeal soon broadened to cross-racial and ethnic lines.

Last question: Why is the fear of President Barack Obama's gun control proposals spooking the White man?

Simple. The National Rifle Association is working double time to scare up fundraising to defeat senators who are incumbents. They're trying to defeat the Democratic Party and President Barack Obama. The president's  proposals for gun control are riling up the white supremacist/conservative bubble. They are buying firearms in huge quantities. Despite the constant pleas from victims of gun violence (i.e. Santa Monica shooting, Sandy Hook shooting, Trayvon Martin, Aurora shooting, and Tuscon shooting) the NRA and its allies in the Republican Party are determined to stop proposals that may prevent the next mass shooting.

Okay, now before we get into the story, we'll talk about the Santa Monica College shooting.

Santa Monica shooter John Zawahri represents the rise in firearm usage among those who are mentally insane.

A 24-year old man named John Zawahri went on a shooting rampage last week. He killed five people before the police killed him. The man was a few days shy of his birthday. Somehow, I guess he's been mentally unstable for some time.

He ended up killing his father and brother before setting his home on fire. He carjacked a woman. He grazed a woman with a few shots. He shot at a bus going by. He shot a vehicle with people inside. He grazed a woman with his firearm. Then he managed to kill a Santa Monica College professor and his daughter.

When confronted by the cops, he aimed and they've fired. Zawahri was killed and while they were checking his body for weaponry, they've found a note saying his forgiveness for his actions.

The New York Daily News reports that Zawahri left a farewell note in which he expressed remorse for killing his father and brother but left no explanation for the rampage that left them and three others dead in Santa Monica, police said Thursday.

The three- to four-page handwritten note was found on Zawahri’s body after he was shot and killed June 7 by officers on the campus of Santa Monica College, Police Chief Jacqueline Seabrooks said at a news conference.

In the note, which was conversational in tone, 23-year-old Zawahri also said goodbye to friends and expressed hope that his mother would be taken care of and receive recompense from his father’s estate.

Police shoot and kill Zawahri before he could reload his homemade assault rifle.

Zawahri apparently built his own .223-caliber assault rifle, using it to shoot his father and brother before he set fire to their family home, officials said earlier Thursday.

Zawahri’s bedroom, investigations found illegal zip guns, Seabrooks said. They also found ample evidence of his fascination with weapons, including four replica airsoft pellet guns, knives and gun magazines, said Sgt. Richard Lewis. Investigators also found materials that indicate he likely assembled the weapon.

Police said Zawahri bought a lower receiver that was only 80 percent complete. Because it is not complete and not considered a full weapon, a person isn’t required to go through a background check to get one, nor does the part need to have a serial number.

Understand this.

He wasn't able to purchase a firearm, but yet he managed to outmaneuver the law by purchasing accessories to the firearm.

No one could stop him from making a straw purchase. Even though he had known mental issues, that was thrown under the table because he had the cash.

The new NRA president James Porter is a fat White asshole who once represented gun manufacturers. Besides he's packing more than his firearm on his holster.

California Democratic Governor Jerry Brown and President Barack Obama were informed about the shooting that day. The president was in Los Angeles and his Secret Service detail were told of this incident.

Last April, the gun control measure compromise by conservative lawmakers Senator Pat Toomey (R-Pennsylvania) and Senator Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) went up in smoke.

The Senate refused to pass even the most water-down legislation capable from stop the next mental patient from obtaining a firearm.

The people of Sandy Hook were lobbying members of Congress to help pass the law. They've ignored it and called the parents of Sandy Hook a bunch of Obama supporters. The conservative agitators send their phony sympathies to the families but told in the second verse they've told the Sandy Hook families to shut up and go away.

Now the National Rifle Association is back in the news. I look at the Redding News Service and clicked on an article from the UK's Daily Mail, a London based newspaper.

They've reported that President Barack Obama and New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg were featured in a NRA online web video in which they were heavily criticized for their gun control proposals.

What's got the Daily Mail buzzing was the apparent blackening of the president. Hence the sinister feature.

In the ad, Bloomberg's face appears to be shaded, as well, but much less dramatically than the president's
Obama's darker appearance in the ad is being compared to a controversial 1994 Time magazine cover that shows a shaded image of former Buffalo Bills running back O.J. Simpson - who, at the time, was on trial for the brutal murders of his ex-wife and another man - that makes his skin seem much darker than it actually is.

The Time magazine cover came at a time when racial tensions across the U.S. began heating up as a result of the Simpson trial, which divided the country along racial lines for a variety of reasons.

Specifically, those skeptical about the state's case against Simpson charged that the lead investigator on the case, former Los Angeles Police Department Detective Mark Fuhrman, was racist and had planted evidence to frame the Heisman trophy winner.

Oh, look scary people on the TV screen....

James Gaines, the managing editor of the magazine when the now-infamous cover was published, later posted an explanation online.

'It seems to me you could argue that it's racist to say that blacker is more sinister, but be that as it may: To the extent that this caused offense to anyone, I obviously regret it,' Gaines said in his message.

The NRA did not respond to Mail Online's request for comment, nor has it responded to any of the criticism that the ad is racist.

The NRA dropped more than $100,000 on the ad, which will start airing in West Virginia in two weeks.

The ad quotes one of Manchin's videos from his 2010 Senate campaign, in which he says 'As your senator, I'll protect your second amendment rights.'

A voiceover in the ad then says, 'That was Joe Manchin's commitment. But now, Manchin is working with President Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Concerned? You should be. Tell Sen. Manchin to honor his commitment to the Second Amendment and reject the Obama-Bloomberg gun control agenda.'

Manchin - who has previously received an 'A' rating from the NRA - recently sponsored a bill with Republican Pennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey that would have expanded background checks on gun buyers to include sales at gun shows and over the Internet.

The bill failed to get the 60 votes needed to avoid a filibuster, but Manchin recently said that he hopes the Senate would again consider expanding background checks - which is what put him the cross-hairs of the nation's most powerful gun lobby.